2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmb.2017.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Una lista actualizada de los murciélagos de la región de Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…obs. ), these bromeliad species may provide nectar throughout the year as food for a local nectarivorous bat community, which comprises at least three species at the studied site (but see Coates et al 2017). Anoura geoffroyi seems to be present in the area for most of the year, using the numerous caves for roosting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…obs. ), these bromeliad species may provide nectar throughout the year as food for a local nectarivorous bat community, which comprises at least three species at the studied site (but see Coates et al 2017). Anoura geoffroyi seems to be present in the area for most of the year, using the numerous caves for roosting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study highlights the importance of continued mammalian surveys in the Neotropics. In Los Tuxtlas, most of the small mammal sampling efforts have been conducted on lower and mid elevation range habitats, close to well-communicated towns and rural communities ( Estrada et al 1994 , González-Christen 2008 , Coates et al 2017 ). Interestingly, there is a consistent absence of records of Cryptotis nelsoni in these lower and mid elevation sites, possibly reflecting true absences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was known from just 2 specimens collected by Auguste Salle in 1857 in the same locality, San Ándres Tuxtla (18°26′ N, 095°12′ W) and deposited in the collections of the British Museum of Natural History Museum London, UK (Arroyo-Cabrales and Ramos Rivera 2017, Coates et al 2017). González et al (2002) erroneously reported P. centralis from the locality of "El Conejo" (19°31′ N, 097°08′ W, alt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molossid species occurring in the state of Veracruz are underrepresented in scientific collections; the only NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION records of P. c. centralis in Veracruz are based on 2 museum specimens, both collected in the same locality in 1895 (Coates et al 2017). Natural history information on P. centralis is scarce (Eger 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%