2013
DOI: 10.1142/s0129054113400339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unambiguous Constrained Automata

Abstract: Abstract. The class of languages captured by Constrained Automata (CA) that are unambiguous is shown to possess more closure properties than the provably weaker class captured by deterministic CA. Problems decidable for deterministic CA are nonetheless shown to remain decidable for unambiguous CA, and testing for regularity is added to this set of decidable problems. Unambiguous CA are then shown incomparable with deterministic reversal-bounded machines in terms of expressivity, and a deterministic model equiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All complexity results obtained in this paper are summarized in Figure 1, except for the undecidability of general monogenic classes as it is a family of classes rather than one class. CFM13]. In [FL02], Finkel and Leroux consider a model more general than affine Z-VASS in which transitions are additionally equipped with guards which are Presburger formulas defining admissible sets of vectors in which a transition does not block.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All complexity results obtained in this paper are summarized in Figure 1, except for the undecidability of general monogenic classes as it is a family of classes rather than one class. CFM13]. In [FL02], Finkel and Leroux consider a model more general than affine Z-VASS in which transitions are additionally equipped with guards which are Presburger formulas defining admissible sets of vectors in which a transition does not block.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work is primarily related to the work of Finkel and Leroux [23], Iosif and Sangnier [27], Haase and Halfon [24], and Cadilhac, Finkel and McKenzie [12,13]. In [23], Finkel and Leroux consider a model more general than affine Z-VASS in which transitions are additionally equipped with guards which are Presburger formulas defining admissible sets of vectors in which a transition does not block.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haase and Halfon [24] studied the complexity of the reachability, coverability and inclusion problems for Z-VASS and reset Z-VASS, two submodels of the affine Z-VASS that we study in this paper. In [12,13], Cadilhac, Finkel and McKenzie consider an extension of Parikh automata to affine Parikh automata with the finite-monoid restriction like in our paper. These are automata recognizing boolean languages, but the finite-monoid restriction was exploited in a similar way to obtain some decidability results in that context.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iterating min breaks semilinearity. Deterministic automata equipped with copyless registers with only "+c" updates are quite well-behaved [3,Section 6]; in particular, the set R = {r | r are the values of the registers at the end of an accepting run} is semilinear. Naturally, min{x, y} is expressible in FO[<, +], hence FO[<, +] = FO[<, +, min] (even, and this is not immediate, when the extra value ∞ is added [4]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%