2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unbiased analysis of obesity related, fat depot specific changes of adipocyte volumes and numbers using light sheet fluorescence microscopy

Abstract: In translational obesity research, objective assessment of adipocyte sizes and numbers is essential to characterize histomorphological alterations linked to obesity, and to evaluate the efficacies of experimental medicinal or dietetic interventions. Design-based quantitative stereological techniques based on the analysis of 2D-histological sections provide unbiased estimates of relevant 3D-parameters of adipocyte morphology, but often involve complex and time-consuming tissue processing and analysis steps. Her… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 78 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adipocytes in different adipose tissue depots have different morphology and fulfill different tasks. They also differ in their reaction toward obesity (adaptive growth patterns)—see Stenkula and Erlanson-Albertsson ( 58 ) and recent quantitative morphological analyses of adipose tissue in porcine biomedical models by Theobalt et al ( 59 ). In line with these findings we found major histological differences between SCAT vs. MAT tissue samples of MIDY and WT pigs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adipocytes in different adipose tissue depots have different morphology and fulfill different tasks. They also differ in their reaction toward obesity (adaptive growth patterns)—see Stenkula and Erlanson-Albertsson ( 58 ) and recent quantitative morphological analyses of adipose tissue in porcine biomedical models by Theobalt et al ( 59 ). In line with these findings we found major histological differences between SCAT vs. MAT tissue samples of MIDY and WT pigs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%