2007
DOI: 10.1155/2007/48348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unbounded Supersolutions of Nonlinear Equations with Nonstandard Growth

Abstract: We show that every weak supersolution of a variable exponent p-Laplace equation is lower semicontinuous and that the singular set of such a function is of zero capacity if the exponent is logarithmically Hölder continuous. As a technical tool we derive Harnacktype estimates for possibly unbounded supersolutions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variable Harnack inequality in the above form was proved by Alkhutov [9] (see also Alkhutov and Krasheninnikova [10]) and subsequently improved to embrace the case of unbounded solutions by Harjulehto et al [36,Theorem 3.9]. There, c H depends only on n, p and the L q s (B(w, 4r ))-norm of u for 1 < q < n n−1 and…”
Section: Remark 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variable Harnack inequality in the above form was proved by Alkhutov [9] (see also Alkhutov and Krasheninnikova [10]) and subsequently improved to embrace the case of unbounded solutions by Harjulehto et al [36,Theorem 3.9]. There, c H depends only on n, p and the L q s (B(w, 4r ))-norm of u for 1 < q < n n−1 and…”
Section: Remark 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, by Theorem 3.5 in Adamowicz et al [3], we have that u * is a (quasicontinuous) supersolution. Furthermore, Corollary 4.7 in Harjulehto et al [36] implies that the p(·)-capacity of the polar set of u * is zero, i.e., C p(·) ({u * = ∞}) = 0, see Definition 2.1, also [3] and [36] for further discussion. Thus, m < ∞.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our result is optimal in the sense that even all known proofs for Harnack's inequality of the p(x)-Laplace equation end up with the additional term R in (1.1), see e.g. [8], [9] and Chapter 13 of [3]. Notice also that the additional R-term appears for the non-homogenous equations even in the case of constant exponent p, see [15] and [6], Chapter 7.5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The following Caccioppoli estimate is the key result of this paper; it corresponds to Lemma 3.2 of [8].…”
Section: Caccioppoli Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation