“…Here, we test the following hypotheses: (1) That mammal abundance and richness is highest with increasing site-scale ground layer habitat cover/complexity , Radford et al, 2020aDavies et al, 2017Davies et al, , 2020Stobo-Wilson et al, 2020a); (2) that mammal abundance and richness is highest at sites where predator (feral cat and dingo), fire and cattle 'disturbance' is least prevalent or abundant (McGregor et al, 2014(McGregor et al, , 2015(McGregor et al, , 2016Lawes et al, 2015;Leahy et al, 2016;Stobo-Wilson et al, 2020a,b;Shaw et al, 2021); (3) that site-and local-scale fire mosaic attributes will be more influential on mammal abundance and richness than broader landscape-or subregional-scale mosaic attributes due to recolonization/dispersal limitations for some mammal species (Leahy et al, 2016;Shaw et al, 2021); and (4) the most important attributes of local and landscape fire mosaics will be presence of longer unburnt habitat based on previous observations (e.g., Legge et al, 2008;, Radford et al, 2020a and that pyrodiversity (diversity of post-fire habitat age) will be positively associated with mammal abundance and richness based on patch mosaic burning theory (critiques by Parr and Andersen, 2006;Jones and Tingley, 2021).…”