2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00325-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainties in the compilation of spatially resolved emission inventories — evidence from a comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One such application of inverse modelling techniques aims at reducing high uncertainties diagnosed in spatially resolved emissions inventories (e.g. Lindley et al, 2000). Again, both variational (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such application of inverse modelling techniques aims at reducing high uncertainties diagnosed in spatially resolved emissions inventories (e.g. Lindley et al, 2000). Again, both variational (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to verify emissions once an emissions database has been compiled, and without transparency in the calculations it is nearly impossible. 5,6,19 Finally, including realistic uncertainties in estimates of emissions would be of great value for all users. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lindley et al 6 found that differences in reported emissions from point sources of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide ranged from Ϫ47.7% to ϩ546% when comparing a local inventory with a regional inventory in the United Kingdom. Similarly, Placet et al 4 showed that aggregate EPA and ARB estimates for nitrogen oxide/oxides of nitrogen emissions in 1995 differed by 20% on a statewide level.…”
Section: Discrepancies Amongmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, incomplete and imperfect monitoring of activity rates together with the associated interannual, seasonal, and even intraday variability in emission factors for each polluting activity can result in large total uncertainties [ van Leeuwen and van der Werf , ]. These uncertainties have been calculated to be larger than the targeted emission reductions themselves [ Peylin et al ., ; Lindley et al ., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%