2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty analysis of impacts of climate change on snow processes: Case study of interactions of GCM uncertainty and an impact model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GCM is currently the most feasible method for predicting large-scale climate changes. However, due to the differences in resolution, initial conditions, and mechanisms of each GCM, the results have significant uncertainty, and the accuracy of the simulated results is closely related to the simulated region and the simulated climate variables [36][37][38][39][40]. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct an adaptive assessment of each GCM in the study area before using GCM data to investigate regional climate change, and then to select the GCMs with better regional adaptability.…”
Section: Multi-model Adaptive Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GCM is currently the most feasible method for predicting large-scale climate changes. However, due to the differences in resolution, initial conditions, and mechanisms of each GCM, the results have significant uncertainty, and the accuracy of the simulated results is closely related to the simulated region and the simulated climate variables [36][37][38][39][40]. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct an adaptive assessment of each GCM in the study area before using GCM data to investigate regional climate change, and then to select the GCMs with better regional adaptability.…”
Section: Multi-model Adaptive Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conceptual models (e.g., lumped hydrological model coupled with a day‐degree approach) are easy‐to‐use tools for projecting future changes in snow hydrological regime (Barnhart et al, ). However, compare with physically based distributed snowmelt runoff models and land surface hydrological models coupled with improved snow physics (Islam & Déry, ; Kudo et al, ; Shrestha et al, ; Wang et al, ; Xue et al, ; L. Zhang et al, ), they are often limited in comprehensively representing the physical processes (e.g., snow accumulation and ablation) of snow hydrology. The land surface hydrological models are thus attractive in data‐sparse regions (e.g., the Tibetan Plateau) with the aid of gridded meteorological forcing and remote sensing data and convenient to be used for projections of future climate impact by coupling a suite of climate models under varied emission scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, ROS index integrate events with a very small contribution of snowmelt to the high flows while neglecting rainfall only events (Cohen et al, 2015;Il Jeong and Sushama, 2018;Pradhanang et al, 2013). The definition of ROS also introduces more uncertainties as it depends on the combination of simulated precipitation and temperature for several days (Kudo et al, 2017). Our heavy rain and warm index minimizes this uncertainty and take into consideration heavy rainfall whatever the amount of snow covering the ground.…”
Section: Relevance Of Rain and Warm Events To Explain Future Evolutiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CC BY 4.0 License. definition of ROS index is also subjected to high uncertainties (Kudo et al, 2017) and this index may not be relevant in regions affected by decrease of snowpack (Il Jeong and Sushama, 2018). These results emphasize the need of new compound climate indices to understand the impact of atmospheric circulation on hydrometeorological extreme events in the Great lake region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%