2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty analysis of in-vessel retention in a high power reactor during severe accident

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was first applied to two designs of reactors: the AP600 (Theofanous et al, 1997), later replaced by the AP1000 design (Esmaili et al, 1997), and the VVER-440 (Kymälainen et al, 1997). Today, new reactor designs have been developed including this IVR strategy and first units become progressively operational: the Korean APR-1400 design (Knudson et al, 2004;Rempe et al, 2004;Whang et al, 2017) and the Chinese HPR-1000 design (Xing, 2017). At the same time, the possibility to apply IVR strategy as back-fitting measure to existing GEN II reactors is currently under consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was first applied to two designs of reactors: the AP600 (Theofanous et al, 1997), later replaced by the AP1000 design (Esmaili et al, 1997), and the VVER-440 (Kymälainen et al, 1997). Today, new reactor designs have been developed including this IVR strategy and first units become progressively operational: the Korean APR-1400 design (Knudson et al, 2004;Rempe et al, 2004;Whang et al, 2017) and the Chinese HPR-1000 design (Xing, 2017). At the same time, the possibility to apply IVR strategy as back-fitting measure to existing GEN II reactors is currently under consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%