2008 IEEE Iinternational Workshop on Advanced Methods for Uncertainty Estimation in Measurement 2008
DOI: 10.1109/amuem.2008.4589940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty analysis of the normalized frequency estimation of a sine wave by three-point Interpolated DFT method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For k 0 > 14 when SNR = 60 dB and for k 0 > 45 when SNR = 90 dB the effect of the wideband noise is much higher than that of the spectral interference. In this case the IpDFT method provides the best estimates, except the situations in which the values of d are close to zero, where the other methods performed the best [20].…”
Section: Average-based Ipdft Methods Versus Other Ipdft Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For k 0 > 14 when SNR = 60 dB and for k 0 > 45 when SNR = 90 dB the effect of the wideband noise is much higher than that of the spectral interference. In this case the IpDFT method provides the best estimates, except the situations in which the values of d are close to zero, where the other methods performed the best [20].…”
Section: Average-based Ipdft Methods Versus Other Ipdft Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Fig. 3 shows the combined standard uncertainty r c provided by the expression (20) and computer simulations as a function of k 0 when the two-term (Fig. 3a) and the threeterm (Fig.…”
Section: Computer Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations