2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10765-006-0134-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty Analysis of Thermophysical Property Measurements of Solids Using Dynamic Methods

Abstract: This work reports on an analysis of thermophysical properties (thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, and specific heat capacity) measurements of solids using dynamic methods. The influence of temperature measurement uncertainty on the parameter estimation uncertainty is studied using a leastsquares procedure. The standard and difference analyses are used for optimizing the experiment with respect to the data window or time interval of measurements. The analysis is applied to the extended dynamic plane sou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18,19 For aerogel samples, there is also a report on the discrepancy in the k result obtained with TPS measurements using different types of sensors insulated with mica and polyimide, where the former type showed a result 54% higher than the later for the same sample. 20 Error in the TPS measurement [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] comes from two sources: (1) uncertainty in the experimental data and the selection of time interval for analysis, and (2) deviation of the original idealized analytical heat transfer model 3,32 from the practical measurement scenario. Previous works on the former aspect focused on the sensitivity of the input parameters and the data fitting procedure based on the original analytical model, but could not explain the overestimation of k in TI materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18,19 For aerogel samples, there is also a report on the discrepancy in the k result obtained with TPS measurements using different types of sensors insulated with mica and polyimide, where the former type showed a result 54% higher than the later for the same sample. 20 Error in the TPS measurement [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] comes from two sources: (1) uncertainty in the experimental data and the selection of time interval for analysis, and (2) deviation of the original idealized analytical heat transfer model 3,32 from the practical measurement scenario. Previous works on the former aspect focused on the sensitivity of the input parameters and the data fitting procedure based on the original analytical model, but could not explain the overestimation of k in TI materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works on the former aspect focused on the sensitivity of the input parameters and the data fitting procedure based on the original analytical model, but could not explain the overestimation of k in TI materials. [21][22][23][24][25][26] In the latter aspect, several publications investigated the accuracy and performance of commercial TPS devices based on numerical simulations to study the effect of the sensors on the TPS measurement for bulk or thin film 20,[27][28][29][30][31] and the error due to thermal radiation in semitransparent sample. 17,33 However, these researches provide no systematic investigation on the sensor geometric parameters and sample thermal properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the results of both models correspond very well for low values of the heating current. Here it should be mentioned that a small heating current causes a small temperature change and consequently a large error in the estimation of the thermophysical parameters [11]. So the optimal heating current range, where the results of both models agree the best, is from 0.3 A to 0.4 A.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Fig. 3, where the characteristic time of the heat source is estimated as h ≈ 10 s to 15 s. Estimates of the parameters can be determined from plateaus or by standard analysis [10,11] as shown in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make sure of the experimental accuracy, each experiment is repeated three times and the average value is acquired. Parameter estimation would be applied to analyze the temperature measurement uncertainty using least-squares procedure [42].…”
Section: Tps Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%