2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.07.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty and correlation analysis of lead nuclear data on reactor parameters for the European Lead Cooled Training Reactor

Abstract: The Total Monte Carlo (TMC) method was used in this study to assess the impact of 204,206,207,208 Pb nuclear data uncertainties on reactor safety parameters for the ELECTRA reactor. Relatively large uncertainties were observed in the k eff and the coolant void worth (CV W ) for all isotopes except for 204 Pb with significant contribution coming from 208 Pb nuclear data; the dominant effect came from uncertainties in the resonance parameters; however, elastic scattering cross section and the angular distributi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is rather unexpected to the authors, taking into account that a single, non-fissile isotope was considered in the uncertainty propagation study. Nonetheless the result is consistent with uncertainty quantification studies that used similar TMC input uncertainties for lead (Alhassan et al, 2015). Despite larger differences between XGPT and reference results compared to the PMF-35 benchmark, also this case study confirms a good agreement between the proposed perturbation-based approach and the TMC method, especially considering the large reduction in computational time requirements.…”
Section: Higher Moments Of Responses Distributions Adopting Xgpt and Podsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is rather unexpected to the authors, taking into account that a single, non-fissile isotope was considered in the uncertainty propagation study. Nonetheless the result is consistent with uncertainty quantification studies that used similar TMC input uncertainties for lead (Alhassan et al, 2015). Despite larger differences between XGPT and reference results compared to the PMF-35 benchmark, also this case study confirms a good agreement between the proposed perturbation-based approach and the TMC method, especially considering the large reduction in computational time requirements.…”
Section: Higher Moments Of Responses Distributions Adopting Xgpt and Podsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As reported in previous works related to the TENDL-based TMC analysis of lead isotopes (e.g., see Alhassan et al, 2015), the k eff distribution appears to be highly skewed. The sample standard deviation and higher moments of the distribution are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Higher Moments Of Responses Distributions Adopting Xgpt and Podmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To infer differential experimental information from the resonance region into the tendl random files will thus need some special treatment. This is however of high importance since the resonance parameters seem to dominate the propagated uncertainty in some applications [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential experimental data are taken into account by using Bayesian statistical inference (Koning, 2015;Helgesson et al, 2015). The TMC method has been presented extensively elsewhere (Koning and Rochman, 2008; and applied to criticality benchmark experiments and reactor applications (Alhassan et al, 2014a;Rochman et al, 2009;Alhassan et al, 2015;Helgesson et al, 2014), and to dose calculations . In Fig.…”
Section: Total Monte Carlomentioning
confidence: 99%