2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3820286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty and Monetary Policy During the Great Recession

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is confirmed by simulations conducted by Pellegrino et al. ( 2022 ) in a model estimated to replicate the recessionary effects induced by the large jump in uncertainty materialized in the United States during the Great Recession. Cho et al.…”
Section: Conclusion and Avenues For Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is confirmed by simulations conducted by Pellegrino et al. ( 2022 ) in a model estimated to replicate the recessionary effects induced by the large jump in uncertainty materialized in the United States during the Great Recession. Cho et al.…”
Section: Conclusion and Avenues For Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…They show that the effects of uncertainty shocks are in line with those documented by the empirical papers cited above. Pellegrino et al (2022) work with a nonlinear Interacted VAR à la Pellegrino (2018Pellegrino ( , 2021 and a narrative identification strategy to estimate the effects uncertainty shocks during the Great Recession. They find them to be substantially larger than in normal times, and interpret this fact via an estimated nonlinear DSGE model in which risk aversion is large (for related contributions, see Bretscher et al (2018) and Caggiano et al (2021b)).…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As anticipated in our Introduction, recent theoretical contributions have put forth mechanisms that lead to a skewed response of real activity to an uncertainty shock (Cacciatore andRavenna (2021), Caggiano, Castelnuovo, andPellegrino (2017), Basu and Bundick (2017), Pellegrino, Castelnuovo, and Caggiano (2022, Jensen, Petrella, Ravn, and Santoro (2020), Andreasen, Caggiano, Castelnuovo, and Pellegrino (2021), Jovanovic andMa (2022), andBretscher, Hsu, andTamoni (2022)). It is of interest to dig deeper to understand how large a role the endogenous response of skewness plays in transmitting, and possibly magnifying, uncertainty shocks to real activity.…”
Section: The Uncertainty-skewness Multipliermentioning
confidence: 87%
“…From a theoretical modeling standpoint, our evidence points to the need of building up frameworks featuring mechanisms that generate the type of uncertainty-skewness interaction we find in the data. Examples of such mechanisms include downward wage rigidities (Cacciatore and Ravenna (2021)), the zero lower bound (Caggiano, Castelnuovo, and Pellegrino (2017), Basu and Bundick (2017)), a combination of first and second-moment shocks (Bloom, Floetotto, Jaimovich, Saporta-Eksten, and Terry (2018)), households' high risk aversion (Caggiano, Castelnuovo, and Pellegrino (2021), Pellegrino, Castelnuovo, and Caggiano (2022), Bretscher, Hsu, and Tamoni (2022)), high firm's leverage (Jensen, Petrella, Ravn, and Santoro (2020)), firms' nominal upward pricing bias (Andreasen, Caggiano, Castelnuovo, and Pellegrino (2021)), and the rapid adoption of new technologies (Jovanovic and Ma (2022)). More in general, our findings offer support to theoretical contributions that have investigated the role of uncertainty shocks as drivers of the business cycle (Bloom (2009), Gourio (2012, Fernández-Villaverde, Guerrón-Quintana, Rubio-Ramírez, and Uribe (2011), Fernández-Villaverde, Guerrón-Quintana, Kuester, and Rubio-Ramírez (2015), Basu and Bundick (2017), and Born and Pfeifer (2021)).…”
Section: Connections With the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodologically, we use a nonlinear interacted VAR (IVAR) model to establish novel facts regarding the different impact of financial uncertainty shocks on a battery of real activity indicators. In computing our impulse responses, we follow Pellegrino (2017, 2021), Caggiano et al. (2017), and Amendola et al.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%