1995
DOI: 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00038-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of food pathway results with the MACCS reactor accident consequence model

Abstract: Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques based on Latin hypercube sampling, partial correlation analysis and stepwise regression analysis are used in an investigation with the MACCS model of the food pathways associated with a severe accident at a nuclear power station. The primary purpose of this study is to provide guidance on the variables to be considered in future review work to reduce the uncertainty in the important variables used in the calculation of reactor accident consequences. The effects o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As one example, Helton et al . (1995) used stepwise regression analysis for sensitivity analysis of a model for contamination of food pathways associated with a severe accident at a nuclear power station.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As one example, Helton et al . (1995) used stepwise regression analysis for sensitivity analysis of a model for contamination of food pathways associated with a severe accident at a nuclear power station.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one example, Helton et al (1995) used stepwise regression analysis for sensitivity analysis of a model for contamination of food pathways associated with a severe accident at a nuclear power station. A probabilistic analysis was done and forward stepwise regression analysis was used to help identify which of the input distributions contributed most to uncertainty in the mean population dose.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, only a few studies have been conducted to obtain the sensitivity indicators for models with correlated input variables. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] However, all these methods can only derive an overall sensitivity index of one parameter, which is not convenient for engineering decision-making. Chonggang et al 20 remarked that the contribution of uncertainty to model output by an individual input variable should be divided into two parts: the uncorrelated contribution and the correlated one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deterministic effect is the "injury in populations of cells, characterised by a threshold dose and an increase in the severity of the reaction as the dose is increased further", where the stochastic effects are the "malignant disease and heritable effects for which the probability of an effect occurring, but not its severity, is regarded as a function of dose without threshold" [46]. Both effects are typically considered as the health effects from the radiological accidents [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, we decided not to include the deterministic effects into the scope of assessment.…”
Section: Determination Of Consequences To Be Consideredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ADD module uses the source term information and meteorological data to simulate the advection and diffusion of the released radioactive materials and their deposition amounts. MS preprocessor code uses the bin sampling method [29] to pick up 248 representative sequences from 8,760 typical meteorological sequences to consider the effects of the meteorological conditions (8,760 meteorological sequences were obtained by recording the meteorological data of the selected location every hour for one year). These meteorological sequences are selected in a manner that can take into account all kinds of weather conditions in a year from very moderate to very extreme.…”
Section: Consequence Analysis (Level 3 Pra Code Oscaar)mentioning
confidence: 99%