2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of National Road Transport Inventories Compiled with COPERT 4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the road transport emission factors reported here, an uncertainty analysis for the particle mass-based emission has been carried out. This analysis shows an uncertainty between 10 and 20 %, depending on the quality of the country's statistics (Kioutsioukis et al, 2010). Particulate number emission factors were not included in the uncertainty evaluation of the above-mentioned study.…”
Section: Emissions In Europe and Their Associated Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the road transport emission factors reported here, an uncertainty analysis for the particle mass-based emission has been carried out. This analysis shows an uncertainty between 10 and 20 %, depending on the quality of the country's statistics (Kioutsioukis et al, 2010). Particulate number emission factors were not included in the uncertainty evaluation of the above-mentioned study.…”
Section: Emissions In Europe and Their Associated Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, it has been observed that both, average speed and traffic situation models tend to overestimate NOx emissions (Smit et al, 2010). Given this particular issue, compiling a realistic traffic emission inventory is ultimately complex due to the large uncertainty levels regarding emission models (Kioutsioukis et al, 2004(Kioutsioukis et al, , 2010Pujadas et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards the environmental performances of this mobility study, we have calculated the emissions of carbon dioxide of the three scenarios by using the Equations from 2 to 8. Pertinent emission factors have been adopted for evaluating the pollutant releases of each modality of transportation, as suggested in the software ©Copert, 4.10 release [42,44]. Buses data were scaled for the average number of passengers typically present in vehicles; the car-pooling data were defined by the car emission values divided by 2.5, which is the average number of passengers using the service in the same time; the motorcycle-pooling data were defined by the motorcycles emission data, divided by the two hypothesized number of passengers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%