1996
DOI: 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00089-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained in the 1992 performance assessment for the waste isolation pilot plant

Abstract: The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WPP) is located in southeastern New Mexico and is being developed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for the geologic (deep underground) disposal of transuranic waste. A detailed performance assessment (PA) for the WIPP was carried out in 1996 and supports an application by the DOE to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the certification of the WIPP for the disposal of TRU waste. The 1996 WIPP PA uses a computational structure that maintains a separation betw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A wide number of methods for uncertainty analysis have been developed and overviews are available in several reviews [51, 52, 53, 54]. Among them, sampling-based approaches are effective and widely used [55, 56, 57, 58, 59]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide number of methods for uncertainty analysis have been developed and overviews are available in several reviews [51, 52, 53, 54]. Among them, sampling-based approaches are effective and widely used [55, 56, 57, 58, 59]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[55][56][57] However, the refinement of the Culebra transport model through time, the development of an appropriate set of model parameters, and an assessment of the subjective uncertainty in these parameters is leading to the conclusion that the Culebra does not constitute a significant pathway to the accessible environment at the WIPP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23][24][25][26][40][41][42][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82]such analyses are open to the criticism that there may not be enough information available to justify the definition of the distributions indicated in Eq. (2.4).…”
Section: Evidence Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%