2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf02994052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty and variability in environmental life-cycle assessment

Abstract: General introductionIncreased rates of resource depletion, land use, solid waste generation and emissions of pollutants became issues of broad public concern in the beginning of the seventies (Meadows et al., 1972). Unfortunately, most of these problems are still with us today, and some of them have increased substantially (World Resources Institute, 1996). One way to decrease the environmental pressure of human activities is the environmentally improvement of production processes (Reijnders, 1996). In this re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
65
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
(196 reference statements)
1
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These sources of uncertainty introduce variability at each stage of the analysis, which are compounded and propagated with subsequent modeling scales and the use of higher complexity models. Several commons approaches are often utilized to quantify uncertainty in environmental sustainability analysis including stochastic modeling and one-at-a-time (OAT) sensitivity analysis [177][178][179]. It is important to note that the primary utility of environmental sustainability analysis is to identify potential environmental impacts or damages of emerging technologies at early stages of R&D. However, recommendations at the design/conceptual phase typically have high uncertainty, which is often only reduced after large investments and progress in R&D have been made.…”
Section: Uncertainty and Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sources of uncertainty introduce variability at each stage of the analysis, which are compounded and propagated with subsequent modeling scales and the use of higher complexity models. Several commons approaches are often utilized to quantify uncertainty in environmental sustainability analysis including stochastic modeling and one-at-a-time (OAT) sensitivity analysis [177][178][179]. It is important to note that the primary utility of environmental sustainability analysis is to identify potential environmental impacts or damages of emerging technologies at early stages of R&D. However, recommendations at the design/conceptual phase typically have high uncertainty, which is often only reduced after large investments and progress in R&D have been made.…”
Section: Uncertainty and Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally in LCA, types of uncertainty and variability are distinguished by location. These are accepted as parameter, model, choices, temporal and spatial uncertainty [24]. For LCAs of CNTs these uncertainties are characterised in Table 3.…”
Section: Identified Areas Of Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Différentes méthodologies ou approches ont été développées ces trente dernières années pour Bayésienne (Huijbregts, 2001, Björklund, 2002, Benetto et al, 2005, l'analyse de sensibilité (Björklund, 2002), l'analyse de scénarios (Björklund, 2002), la matrice de pedigree (Weidema et Waenaes, 1996, Leroy, 2009). …”
Section: Méthodes Et Outils De Mesure Et De Propagation De L'incertitudeunclassified
“…Cependant aucune de ces approches ou méthodes n'est universelle et chaque type d'incertitude à superviser nécessite l'implémentation d'une méthodologie qui lui est propre (Huijbregts, 2001). …”
Section: Méthodes Et Outils De Mesure Et De Propagation De L'incertitudeunclassified