Uncertainty evaluation of the conducted emission measurements

Abstract

For the evaluation of measurement uncertainty in measuring the conduction emission, in this paper we propose a new model which uses mixed distribution. Evaluation of probability density function for the measurand has been done using Monte Carlo method and a modified least-squares method (combined method). In addition, the number of data n and the number of classes of histogram k which were used for simulation, were varied

Free‐Electron Gas Spectrum Uniqueness in the Mixture of Noble Gases

“…The relative combined measurement uncertainty pertaining to the experimental procedure was lower than 3% [20,21].…”

Wavelet-based Analysis of Impulse Grounding Resistance–Experimental Study of the “A”-type Grounding System

“…Comparable analyses of the same measurement as well as the other types of grounding resistance can be found in [11,12], respectively. Experimental research of the A-type grounding presented herein was conducted at two locations: (1) the experimental polygon, where the purpose-built type-A grounding was applied in this investigation, and (ii) the tower of the 110-kV operating transmission line switched off during Experiment procedures were conducted in controlled conditions in a way that the expanded combined measurement uncertainty was less than 3% [12][13][14].…”

The influence of magnetic field shape on dielectric characteristics of vacuum switches

“…Concisely, the measurement uncertainty totalled 4.6% (combined uncertainty) for the ac measurement. Simultaneously, the measurement uncertainty equalled 4.8% (combined uncertainty) for the pulse measurement and 3.6% (uncertainty type B) in the case of a series of measurements that were carried out for nominal and short-circuit current and being less than 0.5% (uncertainty type B) for the inter-electrode distance [22].…”