2017
DOI: 10.1503/jpn.170003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty exposure causes behavioural sensitization and increases risky decision-making in male rats: toward modelling gambling disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One potential explanation may be an increase in risk tolerance, as animals are repeatedly exposed to testing. Indeed, exposing animals to unpredictable schedules of reward increases risky decision making . However, animals have previously been shown to demonstrate consistent performance across multiple test days on the rGT, indicating that increased risk tolerance alone is insufficient to account for the increase in disadvantageous choice and rather exposure to cocaine appears to be critical in instantiating or exacerbating these negative effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential explanation may be an increase in risk tolerance, as animals are repeatedly exposed to testing. Indeed, exposing animals to unpredictable schedules of reward increases risky decision making . However, animals have previously been shown to demonstrate consistent performance across multiple test days on the rGT, indicating that increased risk tolerance alone is insufficient to account for the increase in disadvantageous choice and rather exposure to cocaine appears to be critical in instantiating or exacerbating these negative effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crucially, it appears that repeated exposure to reward uncertainty subsequently increases risk preference on the rGT (Zeeb, Li, Fisher, Zack, & Fletcher, 2017). Similarly, the introduction of salient cues to winning trials, to what is termed the cued rGT, results in riskier and more disadvantageous choice behavior than when exposed to the uncued task (Barrus & Winstanley, 2016).…”
Section: Cue Sensitivity and Sensitization In Gamblingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-sensitization and the resulting hyperresponsivity of dopaminergic systems also occurs between drugs of abuse and natural rewards (Avena & Hoebel, 2003) and drugs of abuse and stress (at both behavioral and physiological levels) (Cruz, Marin, Leão, & Planeta, 2011;Garcia-Keller et al, 2013;Piazza et al, 1990). There is also evidence for cross-sensitization between drugs of abuse and gambling (Boileau et al, 2014;Mascia et al, 2018;Singer, Scott-Railton, & Vezina, 2012;Zack, Featherstone, Mathewson, & Fletcher, 2014;Zeeb et al, 2017), and between gambling and stress (C. L. Green et al, 2017).…”
Section: Cross-sensitization: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A priming dose of amphetamine can increase motivation to gamble [21] and pathological gamblers show evidence for greater amphetamineinduced striatal DA release [22], suggesting that the two disorders share overlapping mechanisms and are susceptible to crosssensitization [23,24]. Some recent preclinical studies have directly supported this possibility, but are limited to demonstrations that exposure to uncertainty enhances the locomotor response to amphetamine [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%