Air-Surface Exchange of Gases and Particles (2000) 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-9026-1_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty in Estimation of Wet Deposition of Sulphur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, FRAME modelled data are compared against the CBED (Concentration Based Estimated Deposition; Smith et al (2000Smith et al ( , 2001) wet deposition data which is generated from measurements from the national monitoring networks of gas concentrations in air and ion concentrations in precipitation. CBED dry and wet deposition forms the official UK data set for estimation of exceedance of critical loads for acid deposition and nitrogen deposition.…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, FRAME modelled data are compared against the CBED (Concentration Based Estimated Deposition; Smith et al (2000Smith et al ( , 2001) wet deposition data which is generated from measurements from the national monitoring networks of gas concentrations in air and ion concentrations in precipitation. CBED dry and wet deposition forms the official UK data set for estimation of exceedance of critical loads for acid deposition and nitrogen deposition.…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods for generating maps of sulphur and nitrogen deposition for the United Kingdom include application of the EMEP European scale Lagrangian model (Tarrasón et al, 2003) and the Concentration Based Estimated Deposition technique (CBED, Smith et al, 2000;Smith and Fowler, 2001). The latter is a methodology based upon interpolation of wet deposition and gas concentrations measured at sites in the national monitoring networks.…”
Section: Maps Of Deposition Of Sulphur and Nitrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(the CBED model, Smith & Fowler, 2001) is illustrated in Figure 9. From the UKEAP concentration, added to the predicted low-level deposition at that geographical location.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBED model (Smith and Fowler, 2001) for all ions. Although we have no data on the spatial 405 variation of this ratio for sodium across the U.K., this difference in orographic scavenging 406 factor would make a 30% difference to annual wet-deposited sodium if it applied at all sites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%