2011
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty in land cover datasets for global land‐surface models derived from 1‐km global land cover datasets

Abstract: Abstract:The influence of the uncertainties or differences in 1-km global land cover datasets on a land cover dataset used in land-surface modelling is explored. The uncertainties in six 1-km global land cover datasets were found to be transferred to land cover datasets derived by either the dominant land cover type method (DLM) or the area ratio method (ARM). The agreement among the DLM-derived land cover datasets (the DLM agreement) was higher than the per-pixel agreement among the six 1-km global land cover… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not specify the future land cover dataset according to the SRES A1B scenario, but used the same dataset as for the present climate. Note that there are large uncertainties in current land classification in available satellite-based 1-km global land cover datasets (Nakaegawa, 2011;Nakaegawa, 2012). Furthermore, we did not simulate any irrigation in our projections; irrigation is known to influence global climate (Boucher et al, 2004;Puma and Cook, 2010) and river discharges (Kustu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not specify the future land cover dataset according to the SRES A1B scenario, but used the same dataset as for the present climate. Note that there are large uncertainties in current land classification in available satellite-based 1-km global land cover datasets (Nakaegawa, 2011;Nakaegawa, 2012). Furthermore, we did not simulate any irrigation in our projections; irrigation is known to influence global climate (Boucher et al, 2004;Puma and Cook, 2010) and river discharges (Kustu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various assessments of the global land cover data sets were carried out in early studies [27,29,30,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. However, the assessments were not evenly distributed among the global, and China has not been given enough attention regarding accuracy assessment of land cover dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine CGCMs captured well the spatial distribution of climatological annual mean surface soil moisture (correlation coefficients greater than 0.70), and another nine CGCMs could not capture it (correlation coefficients less than 0.50). Low performance in capturing the spatial distribution of surface soil moisture might be due to differences in soil column depths and soil geographical distributions (Entin et al, 1999), as mentioned above, as well as to different land-cover types (e.g., Nakaegawa, 2011) used by the different CGCMs. Soil moisture is determined as the residual of the land-surface water balance after complicated land-atmosphere coupling processes (Seneviratne et al, 2010).…”
Section: Validation Of Historical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%