2002
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/19/14/101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty in measurements of distance

Abstract: Ng and van Dam have argued that quantum theory and general relativity give a lower bound ∆ℓ ℓ 1/3 ℓ 2/3 P on the uncertainty of any distance, where ℓ is the distance to be measured and ℓP is the Planck length. Their idea is roughly that to minimize the position uncertainty of a freely falling measuring device one must increase its mass, but if its mass becomes too large it will collapse to form a black hole. Here we show that one can go below the Ng-van Dam bound by attaching the measuring device to a massive … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows to note that the meaning β = 1/4 in our approach appears in section 3 non in an artificial way but as the maximal meaning for which Spρ(β) still stays real, according to (7) and (8). Apparently, if considering corrections of order higher than 1 on β, then members from O(β 2 ) in the formula for ρ out in (10) can give quantum corrections [22] for S semiclass BH (18) in our approach.…”
Section: Bekenstein-hawking Formulamentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It follows to note that the meaning β = 1/4 in our approach appears in section 3 non in an artificial way but as the maximal meaning for which Spρ(β) still stays real, according to (7) and (8). Apparently, if considering corrections of order higher than 1 on β, then members from O(β 2 ) in the formula for ρ out in (10) can give quantum corrections [22] for S semiclass BH (18) in our approach.…”
Section: Bekenstein-hawking Formulamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For instance, from an ideal experiment associated with Gravitational Field and Quantum Mechanics a lower bound on minimal length was obtained in [6], [7] and improved in [8] without using GUR to an estimate of the form ∼ L p . Let us to consider equation (3) in some detail.…”
Section: Fundamental Length and Density Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gravitational nature of macroscopic clock(-system)s is taken into account in [116], where they are commented to be expected not to exhibit quantum properties much above the Planck scale. The quantum nature of rulers of mass smaller than the Schwarzschild limit is expected [117] to be manifest at distances comparable to the Planck scale or less than one order of magnitude larger than it. The Planck-scale fluctuations (for vacuum) in measurement apparati [118] and the space range of the vacuum fluctuations in the apparati has been analyzed to be also possibly large, but subject to fine tuning.The physical passage form quantum foam to General Relativity is presented in [119] 6.…”
Section: Length Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some readers may ponder why do we need to consider a concentrated region of space. The reason is that if we allow the clock to be more massive by making it bigger, it also deteriorates its performance (see the discussion in [13] in response to [14]). …”
Section: Fundamental Limits To Realistic Clocksmentioning
confidence: 99%