2007
DOI: 10.1021/ac071933h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty in modern spectrophotometers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Source fluctuation noise behaves in a similar statistical manner to shot noise, being white noise with a Poisson distribution in the rate of arrival of photons [24]. Together source fluctuation and shot noise follow the generalised Equation (6). Unless the transmitted intensity is very low, source fluctuation noise tends to dominate shot noise.…”
Section: Shot Noise and Source Fluctuation Noisementioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Source fluctuation noise behaves in a similar statistical manner to shot noise, being white noise with a Poisson distribution in the rate of arrival of photons [24]. Together source fluctuation and shot noise follow the generalised Equation (6). Unless the transmitted intensity is very low, source fluctuation noise tends to dominate shot noise.…”
Section: Shot Noise and Source Fluctuation Noisementioning
confidence: 98%
“…An authoritative study into spectrometer noise was that of Rothman et al using a single beam molecular absorption spectrophotometer (EU-701A, GCA McPherson Corp.) [5]. It was still considered as such more than thirty years after publication [6,7]. More recently studies have been carried out to characterise spectrometer developments such as diode arrays, photomultiplier tubes and CCDs [6,8,9,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2a, inset), but also a very important systematic component. In uorescence measurements, the systematic component (spatial uncertainty) is compensated for by experimental operation according to eqn (3), whereas the random component (temporal uncertainty) follows eqn (6). Thus, only a part (but not the most important one) of the apparent uncertainty in Fig.…”
Section: Signal-to-noise and Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 UV-visible absorption and uorescence have different working conditions; the former is usually used under high light level conditions in the detector, whereas low signals in the detector are commonplace in uorescence measurements. Thus, the factors affecting the uncertainty in the signal may be different in both cases, and uncertainty studies on absorption 5,6 may not apply to uorescence. The same theoretical bases dictate uncertainty in both situations, and they were established long ago; 1,[7][8][9][10][11] however, it is difficult to nd laboratory data to back them up in the case of uorescence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%