2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty of Measurement for Design Engineers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement was repeated in three sections at the depth of the hole. The adjacent cylinder with a mean diameter of ø 8.0050 ± 0.0011 mm was determined from the measurements for each hub [16]. After assembly, the set was subjected to tests aimed at verifying the correctness of the numerical model which was built for the analysis of the load-bearing capacity of the joint depending on the interference value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measurement was repeated in three sections at the depth of the hole. The adjacent cylinder with a mean diameter of ø 8.0050 ± 0.0011 mm was determined from the measurements for each hub [16]. After assembly, the set was subjected to tests aimed at verifying the correctness of the numerical model which was built for the analysis of the load-bearing capacity of the joint depending on the interference value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement was repeated in three sections at the depth of the hole. The adjacent cylinder with a mean diameter of ø 8.0050 ± 0.0011 mm was determined from the measurements for each hub [16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%