2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2021.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty quantification for chromatography model parameters by Bayesian inference using sequential Monte Carlo method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yamamoto; Yajima; Kawajiri (2021) proposed a low computational effort Monte Carlo-based algorithm for parameter uncertainty estimation for chromatographic processes, such as SMB, taking glucose and fructose resolution as a case study. 30 Grosfils (2009) and Grosfils et al (2007Grosfils et al ( , 2010, in turn, developed pioneer works of uncertainty analysis for batch experiments in the adsorption field. 3,22,31 The work proposed herein deepens the subject by adding data reconciliation to SMB parameter estimation, model topology evaluation, optimization of the number of experiments, and estimability analysis without a need for available system knowledge such as suitable AIE, minimum number of experiments, and best operating conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yamamoto; Yajima; Kawajiri (2021) proposed a low computational effort Monte Carlo-based algorithm for parameter uncertainty estimation for chromatographic processes, such as SMB, taking glucose and fructose resolution as a case study. 30 Grosfils (2009) and Grosfils et al (2007Grosfils et al ( , 2010, in turn, developed pioneer works of uncertainty analysis for batch experiments in the adsorption field. 3,22,31 The work proposed herein deepens the subject by adding data reconciliation to SMB parameter estimation, model topology evaluation, optimization of the number of experiments, and estimability analysis without a need for available system knowledge such as suitable AIE, minimum number of experiments, and best operating conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, UQ based on Bayesian statistics has been used in various areas of chemical engineering. [21,22] In particular, Kalyanaraman et al [22] quantified the uncertainty of the model parameters for the gas adsorption process using hollow fiber membrane adsorbent. To date, however, there has not been a study on modeling the gas adsorption process of flexible MOFs quantifying the uncertainty of the model parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23,24] Bayesian approaches have been reported in many fields [23] including medicine and biology, as well as chemical engineering. [25][26][27] Recently, applications to a CO 2 adsorption process [22] and a liquid chromatographic process [21] have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the popularly used acquisition functions are expected improvement (EI), maximum probability improvement (MPI), lower confidence bound (LCB), etc. Bayesian optimization is becoming popular in process optimization as well, for instance, multiobjective optimization based on the optimal design of the reactor using CFD data, , optimization-based design and optimization of toluene di-isocyanate (TDI) reactors, robust optimization with uncertainty quantification, development of data-driven decision-making systems for chemical synthesis, , optimization of process parameters for the conversion of a mixture of waste terpenes to p -cymene, process design, and an optimized process model built by implying aspen plus . The multiobjective optimization for maximizing methanol production and reducing carbon emission uses the genetic algorithm .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%