2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty quantification in experimental frequency based substructuring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these issues the reader is referred to the specific literature on Frequency Based Substructuring (see for instance [4,24,5]). …”
Section: General Remarks On Blocked Force and Free Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these issues the reader is referred to the specific literature on Frequency Based Substructuring (see for instance [4,24,5]). …”
Section: General Remarks On Blocked Force and Free Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more recent years the literature concerning FRF uncertainty has been driven by an interest in the fields of dynamic sub-structuring, modal analysis, and transfer path analysis. It has been shown that inconsistencies in measured FRF matrices can lead to: the extraction of incorrect modal parameters [25], spurious peaks in sub-structured FRF predictions [26,27,28], and large errors in reconstructed force estimates [29]. These examples further highlight the need to establish suitable methods for the treatment of uncertainty in experimental structural dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interested in the effect of FRF uncertainty on dynamic sub-structuring procedures, de Klerk and Visser [30] attempted to characterise the experimental error associated with inconsistent excitation and response orientation, particularly in the measurement of driving point FRFs. The authors subsequently proposed an uncertainty propagation procedure for use in the prediction of coupled assembly FRFs [31,27]. Although the authors considered the separation of real and imaginary components using a complex matrix mapping, they chose not to account for their possible correlation, nor the correlation between the individual elements of the FRF matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed discussion on this issue was presented by Voormeeren and Rixen [21]. The influence of the uncertainties in the measurements of vibration time histories of substructures on interpreted FRFs was studied by Voormeeren et al [22]. Statistical moment method was used to quantify the propagated uncertainties in the coupled system's FRFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%