2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-023-08327-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty quantification in mechanistic epidemic models via cross-entropy approximate Bayesian computation

Abstract: This paper proposes a data-driven approximate Bayesian computation framework for parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification of epidemic models, which incorporates two novelties: (i) the identification of the initial conditions by using plausible dynamic states that are compatible with observational data; (ii) learning of an informative prior distribution for the model parameters via the cross-entropy method. The new methodology’s effectiveness is illustrated with the aid of actual data from the COVID-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifth, we assume that five epidemiological parameters in the model (i.e., , , e , r , and d ) require a dynamic parameterization. Previous studies have represented complex COVID-19 outbreak dynamics leveraging a smaller set of dynamic parameters or only the transmission rate as a time-varying parameter [11,18,27,42,43,84]. In the development of the computational pipeline presented in this study we observed that neither constant parameters nor leveraging only as a dynamic parameter rendered a superior performance in reproducing and predicting COVID-19 outbreaks than our dynamic parameterization approach (see Supplementary Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Fifth, we assume that five epidemiological parameters in the model (i.e., , , e , r , and d ) require a dynamic parameterization. Previous studies have represented complex COVID-19 outbreak dynamics leveraging a smaller set of dynamic parameters or only the transmission rate as a time-varying parameter [11,18,27,42,43,84]. In the development of the computational pipeline presented in this study we observed that neither constant parameters nor leveraging only as a dynamic parameter rendered a superior performance in reproducing and predicting COVID-19 outbreaks than our dynamic parameterization approach (see Supplementary Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…However, our approach can be straightforwardly extended by adding a preprocessing step to de-noise the epidemiological data [29,63]. Additionally, our computational pipeline could be recast in a Bayesian framework to accommodate a more robust quantification of uncertainty from the input data to model forecasting [18,35,[40][41][42][43]. With these developments, the computational pipeline could also palliate large oscillations in the daily parameter estimates between successive calibrations, and hence yield more reliable forecasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fidelity of group simulation models has been a time-consuming challenge to address. Cunha et al ( 2 ) introduced a data-driven machine learning framework that employs the cross-entropy method to enhance the fidelity of real-time infectious disease models. Kumar and Susan ( 3 ) suggests a fuzzy time series (FTS) forecasting method based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) to enhance the accuracy of predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%