2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2006.02683
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty quantification in medical image segmentation with normalizing flows

Abstract: Medical image segmentation is inherently an ambiguous task due to factors such as partial volumes and variations in anatomical definitions. While in most cases the segmentation uncertainty is around the border of structures of interest, there can also be considerable inter-rater differences. The class of conditional variational autoencoders (cVAE) offers a principled approach to inferring distributions over plausible segmentations that are conditioned on input images. Segmentation uncertainty estimated from sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aleatoric uncertainty can be captured by placing a distribution over the model output. In image segmentation tasks, this has been achieved by sampling segmentations from an estimated posterior distribution [10,34] and using conditional normalizing flows [44] to infer a distribution of plausible segmentations conditioned on the input image. These efforts succeed in providing shape segmentation with aleatoric uncertainty measures, but do not provide a shape representation that can be readily used for population-level statistical analyses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aleatoric uncertainty can be captured by placing a distribution over the model output. In image segmentation tasks, this has been achieved by sampling segmentations from an estimated posterior distribution [10,34] and using conditional normalizing flows [44] to infer a distribution of plausible segmentations conditioned on the input image. These efforts succeed in providing shape segmentation with aleatoric uncertainty measures, but do not provide a shape representation that can be readily used for population-level statistical analyses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%