2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4940526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty quantification in modeling and measuring components with resonant ultrasound spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimating error for individual elastic stiffness coefficients determined by RUS is challenging and has been proposed by calculating the curvature of the minimum solution to the inverse problem in parameter space. 34 Methods of uncertainty analysis for elastic stiffness coefficients determined by RUS have also been proposed in recent studies, [39][40][41][42] which have commonly involved finite element modeling and Monte Carlo analysis. Accurate estimation of error for RUS measurements deserves the attention of its own study and will be part of future investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating error for individual elastic stiffness coefficients determined by RUS is challenging and has been proposed by calculating the curvature of the minimum solution to the inverse problem in parameter space. 34 Methods of uncertainty analysis for elastic stiffness coefficients determined by RUS have also been proposed in recent studies, [39][40][41][42] which have commonly involved finite element modeling and Monte Carlo analysis. Accurate estimation of error for RUS measurements deserves the attention of its own study and will be part of future investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, knowing what defines a "good match" when comparing measured to model data can be a complicated analysis. Several uncertainty quantifications and analysis studies attempt to answer this question on similar geometries [7,12] and are currently underway for blade populations. …”
Section: Population Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model dimensions were varied for each simulation by creating a parameterized model in SolidWorks [10] and importing each geometry into ANSYS Design Modeler [11]. The material was modeled as a nickel-based superalloy (Mar-M-247), in an anisotropic single crystal (SX) state [6,12]. A Block Lanczos Eigen solver [11] was used to obtain the resonant frequencies for each FE model.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%