2017
DOI: 10.5604/12321966.1235159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncompleted polymerization and cytotoxicity of dental restorative materials as potential health risk factors

Abstract: Małkiewicz K, Wychowański P, Olkowska-Truchanowicz J, Tykarska M, Czerwiński M, Wilczko M, Owoc A. Uncompleted polymerization and cytotoxicity of dental restorative materials as potential health risk factors. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017; 24(4): 618-623. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1235159 Abstract Introduction. Composite materials used in dentistry indicate adverse biological effects in laboratory conditions. One reason for this activity is incomplete conversion of their polymer matrix, favoring chemical instabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Cell viability was assessed by applying the extractions of the control and experimental samples to L929 cells according to the international standard for biocompatibility evaluation, namely MTT analysis [ 6 , 9 ]. Because the denture base is in direct contact with the oral mucosa, it is essential to use a biocompatible material that does not cause hypersensitivity or toxicity [ 30 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. Based on the findings of the MTT assay, there was no statistically significant difference in cell viability between the experimental and control groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell viability was assessed by applying the extractions of the control and experimental samples to L929 cells according to the international standard for biocompatibility evaluation, namely MTT analysis [ 6 , 9 ]. Because the denture base is in direct contact with the oral mucosa, it is essential to use a biocompatible material that does not cause hypersensitivity or toxicity [ 30 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. Based on the findings of the MTT assay, there was no statistically significant difference in cell viability between the experimental and control groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cytotoxicity of the resin composites has been mainly attributed to the release of monomers such as UDMA, HEMA and TEGMA, which are frequently added to the chemical composition of resins 15 . Both the resin content and percentage of monomer conversion of dental materials were considered as potential causes of cytotoxicity 11 . These unconverted monomers, such as TEGMA and UDMA, and photo-initiators, such as camphoroquinone, are known to be cytotoxic for cells 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cytotoxicity of a composite is related both to its chemical composition and to the conversion percentage of its monomers. As it is known, a high conversion percentage is vital for good mechanical properties and biocompatibility 11,12 . Low values of double bond conversion involve a large number of residual monomers trapped in the polymeric matrix, reducing its biocompatibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell populations that simulate oral conditions have been used in order to study the cytotoxicity of dental materials [ 34 ]. Usually gingival fibroblast, keratinocytes of the oral epithelium and standardized strains of mouse L-929 or 3T3 fibroblasts are used for cytotoxicity studying [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually gingival fibroblast, keratinocytes of the oral epithelium and standardized strains of mouse L-929 or 3T3 fibroblasts are used for cytotoxicity studying [ 18 ]. The cytotoxic effects of the eluted substances have been studied by tests that estimate the severity of apoptotic action, the damage to ribonucleic acid and glutathione level in cells [ 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%