2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5966-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncomplicated common bile duct stone removal guided by cholangioscopy versus conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Abstract: In the management of uncomplicated CBDS, our data confirmed the feasibility of DCS for CBDS clearance as it showed efficacy and safety comparable to those of cERCP. Although certain conditions may limit its effectiveness, DCS offers the ability to perform CBDS clearance without the need for fluoroscopy unit and can avoid radiation exposure while ERCP under fluoroscopy remains the current standard of care in patients with CBDS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
43
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ducts were completely cleared (technical success) in 97.3% of patients and cleared in a single session in 77.4% of patients . The results corroborate previously published studies on D‐SOC in the management of difficult‐to‐treat bile duct stones . The overall success rate of stone removal with D‐SOC appears to be over 95%.…”
Section: Therapeutic Cholangioscopic Proceduressupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ducts were completely cleared (technical success) in 97.3% of patients and cleared in a single session in 77.4% of patients . The results corroborate previously published studies on D‐SOC in the management of difficult‐to‐treat bile duct stones . The overall success rate of stone removal with D‐SOC appears to be over 95%.…”
Section: Therapeutic Cholangioscopic Proceduressupporting
confidence: 84%
“…36 The results corroborate previously published studies on D-SOC in the management of difficult-to-treat bile duct stones. 6,22,33,[36][37][38][39][40][41] The overall success rate of stone removal with D-SOC appears to be over 95%.…”
Section: Intraductal Lithotripsy For Difficult Bile Duct Stonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a basket stone extraction was performed instead of planned laser lithotripsy. The mean time of biliary exploration and whole NR-ERCP were 8.60 ± 1.96 (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) and 32.96 ± 16.29 (13-82) minutes, respectively. Setting 10 mm as a cut-off value, 27 and 26 patients were with a dilated and a non-dilated CBD.…”
Section: Comparison Of Technical Details and Outcomes Between Two Modmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a non-radiation strategy may be an alternative for controlling and minimizing in-procedure radiation. To avoid potential radiation caused health consequences, there has been interest in the use of non-radiation ERCP (NR-ERCP) in recent years [7][8][9][10]. There are two major techniques of NR-ERCP, namely endoscopic ultrasound assisted [7,8] and digital cholangioscopy (DCS)-assisted [9,10] ERCP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation