1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02761046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unconditional bases and unconditional finite-dimensional decompositions in Banach spaces

Abstract: Let X be a Banach space with an unconditional finite-dimensional Schauder decomposition (E n ). We consider the general problem of characterizing conditions under which one can construct an unconditional basis for X by forming an unconditional basis for each E n . For example, we show that if sup dim E n < ∞ and X has Gordon-Lewis local unconditional structure then X has an unconditional basis of this type. We also give an example of a non-Hilbertian space X with the property that whenever Y is a closed subspa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We say that (v i ) is block stable if it is C-block stable for some constant C. This property has been considered before in various forms and under different names. In particular, it has been called the blocking principle [2] and the shift property [3] (see [6] for alternative forms).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We say that (v i ) is block stable if it is C-block stable for some constant C. This property has been considered before in various forms and under different names. In particular, it has been called the blocking principle [2] and the shift property [3] (see [6] for alternative forms).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We present a different proof than the one from [2], which has the advantage of being also suitable for the context of local unconditional structures of higher order. In fact, the arguments rely on the calculations done already when proving Proposition 2.2.…”
Section: Local Unconditional Structures In Spaces With Ufddmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It follows that (5) implies (1). That (4) implies (5), that is, Lispchitz isomorphism implies complemented biembeddability, comes from the fact that the spaces considered are separable dual spaces (Theorem 2.4 in [17]). (1) implies (2) by Lemma 2.1 and Corollary 2.2 and the rest is obvious.…”
Section: It Follows That If the Canonical Bases Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%