The nal publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10578-013-0412-8.
Additional information:Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.
Method ParticipantsBoys attending alternative short stay schools in Lancashire were recruited for participation in this study. Such alternative schooling was provided for youth who were permanently or temporarily expelled from their main stream school because of continuous disruptive behaviour. Three schools were contacted about this study for purpose of recruitment and all three agreed to take part. Head teachers of all three short stay schools gave their consent in loco parentis as target age range of youth was 11 to 16 years of age. In addition, and because most participants were still under the age of 16, information on the study was sent to the parents who then had a period of two weeks when they could opt out of the study. None of the parents objected, so each boy within the age range was approached individually by school staff to ask for their assent. In total, 52 boys were asked to participate across the three schools and 50 boys (98%) between the age of 11 to 16 (mean age=14.3; SD=1.2) agreed to participate. . In all samples, a similar factor-structure emerged with three factors (e.g., Uncaring, Callousness, Unemotional) loading on a higher-order CU dimension. Importantly, the total scores proved to be internally consistent in these samples (coefficient alpha .77 to .89) and they were related to antisocial behaviour, aggression, delinquency, various personality dimensions, and psychophysiological measures of emotional reactivity in ways consistent with past research on CU traits. The items were summed, excluding items 2 and 10. Total scores on the ICU could range between 0 and 66 with higher scores reflecting greater levels of CU traits.
Self-report of Violent Delinquency. Participants reported on their violentdelinquency using eight items from the Self-Report of Delinquency Scale (SRD) [42].Participants were required to answer 'yes' (1) or 'no' (0) on whether they have engaged in violent behaviour against others (teachers, students or others) in the past (e.g. "Have you ever hit (or threatened to hit) a teacher or other adult at school?"). Specifically, items also asked about whether they were violent with the intent to harming others (e.g., " Have you ever attacked someone with the idea of seriously hurting or killing him or her?") or obtaining things (e.g., "Have you ever used force (strong-arm method) to get money or things from other students?")...