2001
DOI: 10.1006/ccog.2001.0524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unconscious Familiarity and Local Context Effects on Low-Level Face Processing: A Reconstruction Hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the relationship between familiarity and search asymmetries has shown various results when using facial stimuli. Montoute and Tiberghien (2001) and Masuda (2003) reported that famous faces can be more efficiently detected than unknown faces. Tong and Nakayama (1999) found that subjects searched for their own face more efficiently than other faces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the relationship between familiarity and search asymmetries has shown various results when using facial stimuli. Montoute and Tiberghien (2001) and Masuda (2003) reported that famous faces can be more efficiently detected than unknown faces. Tong and Nakayama (1999) found that subjects searched for their own face more efficiently than other faces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, visual search tasks have also been increasingly employed to study face perception and recognition (Hansen and Hansen 1988;Levin 1996;Lewis and Edmonds 2005;Montoute and Tiberghien 2001;Nothdurft 1993;Ö hman et al 2001;Senju et al 2005;Suzuki and Cavanagh 1995;Tong and Nakayama 1999;von Grü nau and Anston 1995;Williams et al 2005). In a typical visual-search task, participants are required to report the presence or absence of a predefined target among distractors (Treisman and Gelade 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalton (1993) made a similar distinction: local context comprises elements encoded uniquely to one or a few stimulus items, as opposed to global context, which is associated with many stimulus items such as a state of being under the influence of a drug or the environment in the test situation (for reviews see Tiberghien 1986; Dalton 1993; Montoute & Tiberghien 2001). The present study is concerned with local context in Dalton's (1993) sense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%