2014
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awu270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unconscious relational encoding depends on hippocampus

Abstract: See Mayes (doi:) for a scientific commentary on this article.The hippocampus is thought to support only conscious memory, while neocortex supports both conscious and unconscious memory. Duss et al. show that amnesic patients with damage to the hippocampal–anterior thalamic axis exhibit a diminished form of unconscious encoding and retrieval, suggesting that certain forms of unconscious memory are hippocampus-dependent.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
51
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
6
51
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This trace strength level might be sufficient to support robust unconscious memory, which only falls to chance at lower trace strength levels. As Duss et al () recently found in support of this single system view for a relational kind of associative priming, both recognition and priming activated the hippocampus (a likely storage region), although much more activity was found for recognition, which was more sensitive to small hippocampal lesions, than priming. It is less clear, however, whether the kind of item priming identified here corresponds to a weaker level of the same storage system that supports corresponding item familiarity memory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This trace strength level might be sufficient to support robust unconscious memory, which only falls to chance at lower trace strength levels. As Duss et al () recently found in support of this single system view for a relational kind of associative priming, both recognition and priming activated the hippocampus (a likely storage region), although much more activity was found for recognition, which was more sensitive to small hippocampal lesions, than priming. It is less clear, however, whether the kind of item priming identified here corresponds to a weaker level of the same storage system that supports corresponding item familiarity memory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The paradigm that we have used here is a modification of a visual associative inference task that has repeatedly been used to study how the brain constructs memory representations that can flexibly be used for future behavior (Preston, Shrager, Dudukovic, & Gabrieli, ; Zeithamova and Preston, ; Zeithamova et al, ). Similar paradigms have incorporated information about value (Gerraty, Davidow, Wimmer, Kahn, & Shohamy, ; Murty, FeldmanHall, Hunter, Phelps, & Davachi, ; Wimmer and Shohamy, ) or used verbal material that was presented subliminally (Duss et al, ; Reber et al, ). Despite differences in stimulus material and the degree of consciousness of processing of to‐be‐remembered items, the results of these and other fMRI studies converge on a central role of the hippocampus within networks for memory integration (Palombo, Keane, & Verfaellie, ; Schlichting and Preston, ; Shohamy and Daw, ; Zeithamova et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Declining memory performance is perhaps the cognitive deficit most commonly associated with advancing age (see Craik & Rose, 2012 and Khan, Martin‐Montanez, Navarro‐Lobato, & Muly, 2014 for reviews). While the hippocampus clearly plays a vital role in explicit (Riedel et al., 1999; Schacter, Alpert, Savage, Rauch, & Albert, 1996; Squire, 1992) and implicit (Duss et al., 2014) memory, the connectivity between the hippocampus and other brain regions, including the anterior thalamus, has also been implicated in supporting memory function (Aggleton & Brown, 1999; Aggleton et al., 2010; Child & Benarroch, 2013; Jankowski et al., 2013). Evidence from patients with thalamic infarcts supports the view that disrupted thalamo‐cortical structural connectivity is associated with memory problems (Serra et al., 2014), while functional connectivity (FC) strength between the dorsomedial nucleus of the thalamus and parts of the striatum has also been negatively associated with episodic memory functioning in 49‐ to 80‐year‐olds (Ystad, Eichele, Lundervold, & Lundervold, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%