2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep19573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unconventional Magnetism and Band Gap Formation in LiFePO4: Consequence of Polyanion Induced Non-planarity

Abstract: Oxygen plays a critical role in strongly correlated transition metal oxides as crystal field effect is one of the key factors that determine the degree of localization of the valence d/f states. Based on the localization, a set of conventional mechanisms such as Mott-Hubbard, Charge-transfer and Slater were formulated to explain the antiferromagnetic and insulating (AFI) phenomena in many of these correlated systems. From the case study on LiFePO4, through density-functional calculations, we demonstrate that n… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(140 reference statements)
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This ordering is consistent with previous work in literature [157,160] (at least for the ground and first-excited states) and is robust with respect the particular approximation being used, although the energy differences between the various magnetic orders varies with the specific flavor of Hubbard correction in use. For example, for the PBEsol functional the energies of AF 2 and AF 3 are about 10.8, 19.3 meV/f.u.…”
Section: Li-ion and Magnetic Configurationssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This ordering is consistent with previous work in literature [157,160] (at least for the ground and first-excited states) and is robust with respect the particular approximation being used, although the energy differences between the various magnetic orders varies with the specific flavor of Hubbard correction in use. For example, for the PBEsol functional the energies of AF 2 and AF 3 are about 10.8, 19.3 meV/f.u.…”
Section: Li-ion and Magnetic Configurationssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This cell is large enough to accommodate a few antiferromagnetic states and Li configurations which will be compared in the last part of this section. While the energy scale of inter-atomic magnetic interactions makes the comparison of various AFM configurations marginally relevant for the energetics of the material (in particular, for its average voltage and the formation energy of the half-lithiated compound) especially at finite temperatures, this comparative analysis is still interesting to better understand the electronic structure of cathode materials [157] and, in general, to improve their characterization (in comparison with experiments) [158,159], especially if a significant shift of magnetic properties (e.g., the Néel temperature) is expected to correlate with Li intercalation. All the calculations shown in the first part are performed for the antiferromagnetic ordering (named AF1 in the later discussion) that was verified to correspond to the ground state configuration.…”
Section: Electronic Structure and Energeticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While comparison with experimental ∆g iso (Table III) might suggest improved agreement for DFT+U, this would indeed be due to compensation with other errors. We thus have to conclude that, while DFT+U improves hyperfine interactions, magnetic moments, band gap, and other aspects of electronic structure in the present LiTMPO 4 systems [63,[82][83][84][85][86], it is not suitable for response properties, unless one finds a way to mimic the response coupling terms. A correct treatment of solid-state g-tensors with hybrid functionals may provide a better route for future improvement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M x PO4 . This is due to the fact that even though the Olivine phosphates are crystalline solids, the Bloch d electrons behave like atomically localized electrons[14]. To substantiate it further we have plotted the atomic M-d energy levels inFig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%