2021
DOI: 10.1038/s43588-021-00172-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncovering cell identity through differential stability with Cepo

Abstract: We present Cepo, a method to generate cell-type-specific gene statistics of differentially stable genes from single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data to define cell identity. Cepo outperforms current methods in assigning cell identity and enhances several cell identification applications such as cell-type characterisation, spatial mapping of single cells, and lineage inference of single cells.Defining cell identity is fundamental to understand the cellular heterogeneity in the population and the cell-type-s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To resolve genes that underlie retinal cellular identity, we computed a cell-type-specific cell identity score for each gene by dataset and batch using Cepo, a computational method for detecting cell identity genes (Kim et al, 2021). The clustering of samples from across datasets and batches using Pearson’s correlation of Cepo-derived gene statistics show strong grouping by cell type irrespective of the origin of dataset and batch ( Figure 2A ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To resolve genes that underlie retinal cellular identity, we computed a cell-type-specific cell identity score for each gene by dataset and batch using Cepo, a computational method for detecting cell identity genes (Kim et al, 2021). The clustering of samples from across datasets and batches using Pearson’s correlation of Cepo-derived gene statistics show strong grouping by cell type irrespective of the origin of dataset and batch ( Figure 2A ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To derive the cell identity gene statistics for the human retina atlas, the count matrix of cell-gene variables were first log-transformed and normalized using the logNormCounts function from the scater package (McCarthy et al, 2017). The transformed and normalized data from each batch were subsequently analyzed using the Cepo package (Kim et al, 2021) for quantifying cell identity gene statistics for each major cell type based on the differential stability metric. For comparison, alternative methods (e.g., limma (Ritchie et al, 2015), voom (Law et al, 2014), edgeR (Robinson et al, 2010)) based on differential expression analysis were also used for calculating cell-type-specific gene statistics.…”
Section: Quantification and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broad cell type labels were also manually assigned to each cluster, resulting in a total of 13 broad cell type labels across the three data subsets. Marker genes for the consolidated subpopulations in each data subset were identified using the ‘Cepo’ (24) method. Differences in composition of macrophage subpopulations between the control and CF samples were assessed for statistical significance using the ‘propeller’ test from the speckle (version 0.0.3) package (https://github.com/Oshlack/speckle).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As these methods were mostly based on differential expression methods, single cell data provide the opportunity to use ideas from more recent single cell differential expression methods like MAST [ 36 ] which uses a generalized linear model to address the specific biases seen in single cell data. These data also opens up the opportunity for other analyses that depend on the gene expression distribution like differential variability [ 37 ], differential distribution [ 38 ] and differential stability [ 39 ], which may identify TFs with different properties that could be novel candidate TFs for direct cell reprogramming.…”
Section: Computational Approaches In the Single Cell Eramentioning
confidence: 99%