Uncovering Neuronal Networks Defined by Consistent Between-Neuron Spike Timing from Neuronal Spike Recordings

Abstract

It is widely assumed that distributed neuronal networks are fundamental to the functioning of the brain. Consistent spike timing between neurons is thought to be one of the key principles for the formation of these networks. This can involve synchronous spiking or spiking with time delays, forming spike sequences when the order of spiking is consistent. Finding networks defined by their sequence of time-shifted spikes, denoted here as spike timing networks, is a tremendous challenge. As neurons can participate in multiple spike sequences at multiple between-spike time delays, the possible complexity of networks is prohibitively large. We present a novel approach that is capable of (1) extracting spike timing networks regardless of their sequence complexity, and (2) that describes their spiking sequences with high temporal precision. We achieve this by decomposing frequency-transformed neuronal spiking into separate networks, characterizing each network’s spike sequence by a time delay per neuron, forming a spike sequence timeline. These networks provide a detailed template for an investigation of the experimental relevance of their spike sequences. Using simulated spike timing networks, we show network extraction is robust to spiking noise, spike timing jitter, and partial occurrences of the involved spike sequences. Using rat multineuron recordings, we demonstrate the approach is capable of revealing real spike timing networks with sub-millisecond temporal precision. By uncovering spike timing networks, the prevalence, structure, and function of complex spike sequences can be investigated in greater detail, allowing us to gain a better understanding of their role in neuronal functioning.

On the methods for reactivation and replay analysis

“…we may be unable to ground such relations to anything meaningful). Nonetheless, promising new methods that decompose population time series [62], cluster neural patterns [73,74] or estimate neural states [31,75] have begun to be used for the unsupervised detection and quantification of neural sequences. Finally, the recent development of deep learning techniques that can capture the statistics of neuronal patterns, even in single trials [76] is an interesting direction that will probably attract a lot of attention in the coming years.…”

Neural sequences in primate prefrontal cortex encode working memory in naturalistic environments

“…A code that relies on neural sequences implies temporally precise activation of single neurons (see Fig. 2a for schematic) (Buzsáki, 2010; van der Meij & Voytek, 2018). We examined the firing properties of 3543 neurons in 17 recording sessions (mean of 208, median of 229 simultaneously recorded neurons per session).…”

Nine insights from internet engineering that help us understand brain network communication

“…Nevertheless, the results of Nádasdy et al (1999) are ambiguous. More than two decades after this study, it remains very difficult to trace signals as they traverse multiple nodes of known connectivity in a brain network (see van der Meij and Voytek, 2018;Hodassman et al, 2022). Models that rely on inferring causality linking separate measurements of structure and activation (e.g., Javadzadeh and Hofer, 2021) can be misleading (see, e.g., Mehler and Kording, 2018;Brette, 2019;Bruineberg et al, 2021).…”