Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer characterized by high rates of metastasis. Emerging evidence suggests that PD-L1/PD1 blockade holds promise as a therapeutic option for MCC. However, the efficacy and safety of this approach in treating MCC remain incompletely understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade for patients with MCC. Methods PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for studies evaluating patients with MCC undergoing PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. The estimated outcomes were overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). We performed the meta-analysis using RStudio v4.4.2 software. Results A total of 14 reports of 13 different studies encompassing 615 patients were included. The median age ranged from 64 to 77 years. Median follow-up ranged from 7.9 months to 59.3 months. Pooled OS rates at 24 and 36 months were 65.05% (95% CI 44.04–81.49) and 59.58% (95% CI 39.62–76.81), respectively, while pooled PFS rates at 6, 12, and 36 months were 51.78% (95% CI 37.83–65.45), 46.12% (95% CI 29.44–63.72), and 28.73% (95% CI 16.57–45.02), in the same order. DCR proportion was 61.65% (95% CI 54.85–68.03) and ORR was 53.79% (95% CI 47.80-59.68). The frequency of TRAEs of any grade was 61.72% (95% CI 45.75–75.51) and for TRAEs of grade ≥ 3 was 17.60% (95% CI 12.28 to 24.57). Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that patients with MCC undergoing treatment with PD-1/PDL-1 showed durable responses with continuous and clinically meaningful survival outcomes. Graphical Abstract Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-024-13129-1.
Background Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer characterized by high rates of metastasis. Emerging evidence suggests that PD-L1/PD1 blockade holds promise as a therapeutic option for MCC. However, the efficacy and safety of this approach in treating MCC remain incompletely understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade for patients with MCC. Methods PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for studies evaluating patients with MCC undergoing PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. The estimated outcomes were overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). We performed the meta-analysis using RStudio v4.4.2 software. Results A total of 14 reports of 13 different studies encompassing 615 patients were included. The median age ranged from 64 to 77 years. Median follow-up ranged from 7.9 months to 59.3 months. Pooled OS rates at 24 and 36 months were 65.05% (95% CI 44.04–81.49) and 59.58% (95% CI 39.62–76.81), respectively, while pooled PFS rates at 6, 12, and 36 months were 51.78% (95% CI 37.83–65.45), 46.12% (95% CI 29.44–63.72), and 28.73% (95% CI 16.57–45.02), in the same order. DCR proportion was 61.65% (95% CI 54.85–68.03) and ORR was 53.79% (95% CI 47.80-59.68). The frequency of TRAEs of any grade was 61.72% (95% CI 45.75–75.51) and for TRAEs of grade ≥ 3 was 17.60% (95% CI 12.28 to 24.57). Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that patients with MCC undergoing treatment with PD-1/PDL-1 showed durable responses with continuous and clinically meaningful survival outcomes. Graphical Abstract Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-024-13129-1.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.