Uncovering the diverse cultural bases of social identity: Ingroup ties predict self‐stereotyping among individualists but not among collectivists

Abstract

On what basis do people form their social identities? To investigate this issue, the present research investigates crosscultural differences in self-stereotyping, a key outcome of social identification. In particular, the research tests the hypothesis that ingroup ties are a stronger predictor of self-stereotyping among people from individualist cultures than among people from collectivist cultures. In Study 1, university students (N = 117) completed measures of ingroup ties and self-stereotyping with respect to an intimacy group (family and friends). Consistent with predictions, ingroup ties significantly predicted self-stereotyping among individualists but not among collectivists. Study 2 (N = 104) found a similar pattern of results among members of the global internet community who considered either an intimacy group (their friends), a task group (their work group) or a social category (their gender). These results indicate that people in individualist cultures are more likely than those in collectivist cultures to base their social identities on ingroup ties. The implications of these results are discussed in relation to self-categorization theory's depersonalization account of social identification.

A comparative study of Chinese and American preservice teachers’ intention to teach online based on the Theory of Planned Behavior

“…Therefore, it indicated that individualism emphasizes their perceived control more than collectivism, while collectivism emphasizes the subjective norm more than individualism which is consistent with Bandyopadhyay and Fraccastoro (2007). Rubin et al (2016) also supported those individualists are driven by self-oriented factors. As for the outside force such as subjective norm, Chinese preservice teachers are higher than the American preservice teachers which is supported by Cohen et al (2016) who found that collectivism emphasizes context than individualism.…”

Youth's experiences with inclusion, isolation, and discrimination in the LGBTQ+ community

“…Finally, generalizability of the results may be limited to individualist cultures and the role of culture should be addressed more directly in future studies. Among individualists, but not among collectivists, perceiving oneself as similar to ingroup members is positively related to supportive relationships with ingroup members (Rubin, Milanov, & Paolini, 2016). Moreover, among individualists relative to collectivists, the way people feel about themselves internally is more predictive of wellbeing and the perception that others view them positively (Hermann, Lucas, & Friedrich, 2008).…”

Following the best of us to help them: Group member prototypicality and collective action

“…Group identification. Identification with the class was measured by using the 8 items from the identification scale developed by Cameron (2004) (8 items, e.g., "I often think about the fact I am a member of this class"; "I have a lot in common with the other classmates"), and 4 items adapted by Rubin, Milanov, and Paolini (2016)'s scale of self-stereotyping, assessing the degree to which participants perceived themselves as being similar to their classmates (e.g., "I think I am quite similar to the other students of the class"). Participants responded using a 5-point scale anchored to completely disagree (1) and completely agree (5); alpha = .86.…”