“…In this case, the work function of UNH and α-MnO 2 was found to be 3.96 and 5.9 eV, respectively (Figure a), by using the equations given in Table S4, and these outcomes satisfy the first criterion of the S-scheme, i.e., that the reduction photocatalyst should have a higher VB and CB position with a smaller work function related to the oxidation photocatalyst. , Moreover, the Fermi-level position of α-MnO 2 and UNH is provided in Table S4. So, at the interface of the coupled material, the Fermi level of α-MnO 2 and UNH would show upward and downward movement, respectively, to be aligned at the same energy level and satisfies the second criterion (Figure b) of the S-scheme, i.e., Fermi-level alignment to the same energy level by its upward and downward movement in oxidation and reduction photocatalysts, respectively. , Finally, on the basis of its work function and Fermi level, the photogenerated electrons at the conduction band of α-MnO 2 and holes at the valence band of UNH will be recombined at the interface to make available the holes and electrons at their opposite ends for photoredox reaction and it supports the final step (Figure c) of the S-scheme, i.e., the recombination of electrons (oxidation photocatalyst) and holes (reduction photocatalyst) at the interface of the coupled material occurs by the columbic force of attraction. , …”