2013 2nd SEMAT Workshop on a General Theory of Software Engineering (GTSE) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/gtse.2013.6613863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncovering theories in software engineering

Abstract: Abstract-There has been a growing interest in the role of theory within Software Engineering (SE) research. For several decades, researchers within the SE research community have argued that, to become a real engineering science, SE needs to develop stronger theoretical foundations. A few authors have proposed guidelines for constructing theories, building on insights from other disciplines. However, so far, much SE research is not guided by explicit theory, nor does it produce explicit theory. In this paper w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this and the historical roots and traditions in CS and SE, in the specific case of Human Factors in SD, we think that it is justifiable and worthwhile for empirical SE researchers to borrow from the wealth of knowledge in the social and behavioural sciences. First, such theories are good for informing the design of new empirical studies, which might have the long term benefit of helping the research literature converge on a particular topic (or research question), as Stol and Fitzgerald [23] indicate. Second, borrowed theories can contribute to the development of SE-specific frameworks potentially useful to empirical SE researchers for organizing existing concepts from the literature, or in assisting in the development Table 1 The top 10 most cited works in our corpus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite this and the historical roots and traditions in CS and SE, in the specific case of Human Factors in SD, we think that it is justifiable and worthwhile for empirical SE researchers to borrow from the wealth of knowledge in the social and behavioural sciences. First, such theories are good for informing the design of new empirical studies, which might have the long term benefit of helping the research literature converge on a particular topic (or research question), as Stol and Fitzgerald [23] indicate. Second, borrowed theories can contribute to the development of SE-specific frameworks potentially useful to empirical SE researchers for organizing existing concepts from the literature, or in assisting in the development Table 1 The top 10 most cited works in our corpus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, theory, as understood in the field of sciences, has gained popularity in the field of empirical SE [21][22][23]. Members of the International Empirical Software Engineering Research Network (ISERN) engaged increasingly more and more into research initiatives that aim to formulate theories, evaluating theories and evaluating the use of theories in the field [29].…”
Section: Identifying the Main Theories In Human Factors In Software Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, he suggests that 'middle-range' theories are more usable by practitioners. The case for middle-range theories is also made by Stol and Fitzgerald [9,10], who describe them as stepping stones towards a more general and inclusive theory.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Her investigations resulted in a taxonomy of theory types along with a proposed list of structural components of a theory. Stol and Fitzgerald argue that SE research does, in fact, exhibit traces of theory and suggest that the current focus on evidence based software engineering (EBSE) must be combined with a theoryfocussed research approach to support explanation and prediction [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%