2018
DOI: 10.21276/ijcmr.2018.5.9.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

unctional Outcome Analysis of Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures using 'Five Pin Technique'

Abstract: Introduction: Distal radius fractures are the most common fractures of the upper extremity. The commonest mode of injury is a fall on outstretched hand. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning with 'The five pin technique' improves the reliability of fixation. Current study aimed to assess the clinical and functional outcome of fixation of distal radius fractures using the five pin technique Material and Methods: 30 patients with fracture of distal radiuswere subjected to history taking, thorough clinical ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Majority of our patient was in their 4th decade of life, similar to the studies by Bhasme et al 15 and Yamamoto et al, 16 suggesting (Sarmiento 1975) 13 30 45 50 50…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Majority of our patient was in their 4th decade of life, similar to the studies by Bhasme et al 15 and Yamamoto et al, 16 suggesting (Sarmiento 1975) 13 30 45 50 50…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In our study the incidence of distal radius fractures was higher in males (62.5%) in both groups which is similar to studies of Bhasme et al (14) , Hegazy et al (17) and Solanki et al (18) This could be because men are more likely to engage in physically demanding activities such as hiking, biking, and driving. While Vasudevan and Lohith (15) , reported in their study higher incidence in female (57.1%) and this difference may be due to different lifestyles of studied population.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The mean age in Group A was 39.8 and in Group B 40.1 years, which is comparable with studies of Bhasme et al (14) ; mean age 45 years, Vasudevan and Leith (15) ; mean age 49.4 years, Vipin et al (16) mean age 47.1 years, Hegazy et al (17) ; mean age 48.3 years and differ from Solanki, Mahendra et al (18) patients ranged in age from 50 to 80, with 56 years being the median age.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations