1995
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3975(95)00037-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undecidability of bisimilarity for Petri nets and some related problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exploiting the encoding, we immediately obtain that these bisimilarities are undecidable also for open nets. This fact falls outside the known undecidability of bisimilarity for Petri nets [29], as we only observe the interaction with the environment: internal transitions are indistinguishable for strong equivalences and unobservable for weak equivalences (e.g., all standard, closed Petri nets are weakly bisimilar in our setting). In the other direction, using the fact that reachability is decidable for Petri nets, through the encoding we prove that reachability and convergence are decidable for bound asynchronous CCS (which, thus, is not Turing powerful).…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Exploiting the encoding, we immediately obtain that these bisimilarities are undecidable also for open nets. This fact falls outside the known undecidability of bisimilarity for Petri nets [29], as we only observe the interaction with the environment: internal transitions are indistinguishable for strong equivalences and unobservable for weak equivalences (e.g., all standard, closed Petri nets are weakly bisimilar in our setting). In the other direction, using the fact that reachability is decidable for Petri nets, through the encoding we prove that reachability and convergence are decidable for bound asynchronous CCS (which, thus, is not Turing powerful).…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Let us examine three well-known equivalences over finite P/T nets: interleaving bisimilarity (Definition 7), step bisimilarity [27] and net isomorphism (Definition 5). On the one hand, only net isomorphism is decidable for finite P/T nets, while interleaving bisimilarity and step bisimilarity are undecidable [12,21]. On the other hand, net isomorphism is not a congruence for +: for instance, p = a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to put it is to say that all interesting relations between lossy counter machines are undecidable, even if we only consider lossy VAS's (i.e., lossy counter machines without zero-tests). A proof for all relations between bisimilarity and trace containment can be obtained (see [42]) by adapting Jančar's classic proof for Petri nets [30]. The proof certainly extends, e.g., to all equivalences between equality of the reachability set and trace containment modulo invisibility of internal steps.…”
Section: Equivalence Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%