2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Under-canopy UAV laser scanning for accurate forest field measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
87
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
87
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that lower accuracy of ZEB REVO (RMSE of 3.28 cm and rRMSE 10.66 %) is caused by the parameters of the scanner but also by the scanning trajectory, which might create noise points on the surface of the trunks, the inconsistency of scanned data and therefore, affect the process of diameter estimation. Hyyppä et al (2020a) obtained better RMSE of DBH estimation 0.6 cm and rRMSE 2.2 %; however, estimations based on TLS point cloud were used as reference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We assume that lower accuracy of ZEB REVO (RMSE of 3.28 cm and rRMSE 10.66 %) is caused by the parameters of the scanner but also by the scanning trajectory, which might create noise points on the surface of the trunks, the inconsistency of scanned data and therefore, affect the process of diameter estimation. Hyyppä et al (2020a) obtained better RMSE of DBH estimation 0.6 cm and rRMSE 2.2 %; however, estimations based on TLS point cloud were used as reference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As on one of the most important variables for forestry, different authors focus on DBH estimation, with different approaches. For example Liang et al (2016) created a great overview of TLS techniques related to forest inventories and reported that accuracy of DBH estimation varied from 0.7 cm to 7.0 cm (1.8 -3.3 cm, 3.4 -7.0 cm, 0.7 -2.4 cm, and 2.0 -4.2 cm), Čerňava et al (2019) estimated DBH based on MLS system adjusted for forest environment which is shown to be the fastest data collection ground based approach with RMSE of DBH 3.06 cm, more portable backpack method using SLAM achieved high accuracy in steam curve estimation (RMSE of the extracted stem curves was 1.2 cm and 1.7 cm) comparing to TLS references (Hyyppä et al, 2020b), Under-canopy UAV laser scanning method with SLAM corrected point cloud collection was presented as accurate and efficient in comparison with multi-scan TLS approach (Hyyppä et al, 2020a) where RMSE values for the DBH were 0.69 cm at the sparse plot, and 0.92 cm in the obstructed plot. We presents results compared against reference data collected in forest environment measured with the highest accuracy requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to different data acquisition geometries between terrestrial and UAV-borne point clouds, UAV-borne laser scanning is more suitable for characterization of the vertical forest structure whereas TLS or MLS can better capture the horizontal forest structure. An alternative option to combine the benefits of both terrestrial and aerial point cloud-based approaches is to collect the UAV-borne point clouds from inside the canopy [58] or to use a multisensorial approach [59] where photogrammetric UAV point clouds were integrated with TLS data. Use of a combination of bi-temporal terrestrial and aerial point clouds is expected to improve the accuracy of vertical forest characterization in space and time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to different data acquisition geometries between terrestrial and UAV-borne point clouds, UAV-borne laser scanning is more suitable for characterization of the vertical forest structure whereas TLS or MLS can better capture the horizontal forest structure. An alternative option to combine the benefits of both terrestrial and aerial point cloud-based approaches is to collect the UAV-borne point clouds from inside the canopy [59] or to use a multisensorial approach [60] where photogrammetric UAV point clouds were integrated with TLS data. Use of a combination of bi-temporal terrestrial and aerial point clouds is expected to improve the accuracy of vertical forest characterization in space and time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%