2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.20.20039628
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Objective: Depression is the commonest mental disorder in primary care but is poor identified. The objective of this review was to determine the level of detection of depression by primary care clinicians and its determinants in studies from low-and middleincome countries (LMICs). MethodsDesign: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42016039704). Databases:PubMed, PsycINFO, Medline, EMBASE, LILAC and AJOL. Quality assessment: Risk of bias within studie… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All three groups of respondents emphasised social attribution and somatic manifestation of depression, also seen across a range of other cultural settings [34,44] and consistent with findings from several other LMICs [24,41,45]. Presentation of depressive symptoms with somatic complaints might explain higher rates of emergency healthcare visits [38], non-indicated medical investigations, increased likelihood of misdiagnosis and lower detection rates of depression in such settings [46][47][48]. HCWs highlighted that under-detection of antenatal depression may also arise from: (1) the clinical difficulty for non-specialist workers in distinguishing a normal response to social adversity from a depressive episode, and (2) overlap between symptoms of depression and normal symptoms of pregnancy, such as sleep problems and fatigue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…All three groups of respondents emphasised social attribution and somatic manifestation of depression, also seen across a range of other cultural settings [34,44] and consistent with findings from several other LMICs [24,41,45]. Presentation of depressive symptoms with somatic complaints might explain higher rates of emergency healthcare visits [38], non-indicated medical investigations, increased likelihood of misdiagnosis and lower detection rates of depression in such settings [46][47][48]. HCWs highlighted that under-detection of antenatal depression may also arise from: (1) the clinical difficulty for non-specialist workers in distinguishing a normal response to social adversity from a depressive episode, and (2) overlap between symptoms of depression and normal symptoms of pregnancy, such as sleep problems and fatigue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The low sensitivity of the PHC workers in detection of depression in our study sample is consistent with other studies carried out in Ethiopia and other parts of the world (18,(37)(38)(39). In this current study, less than half (45.5%) of the people with epilepsy and comorbid mental disorders were detected by PHC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Despite the use of a locally developed and validated measure, it is also possible that depression was under-detected in our patient population on the whole. Recent literature across a number of LMIC settings has documented challenges in depression detection among task-shared providers (Rathod et al ., 2018 ; Fekadu et al ., 2020 ). We also included only patients treated primarily at facilities, an approach that excluded patients with mild symptoms treated in in the community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%