2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Under-nutrition reduces spermatogenic efficiency and sperm velocity, and increases sperm DNA damage in sexually mature male sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have demonstrated mating preference for chemical signals produced by well-fed individuals compared with their starved counterparts (Fisher and Rosenthal, 2006;Giaquinto, 2010;Baruffaldi and Andrade, 2015). Additionally, under-nourished males may have low sperm counts, poor sperm quality (Dunn and Moss, 1992;Izquierdo et al, 2001;Guan et al, 2014), or lower resistance to disease (Moret and SchmidHempel, 2000). Pheromones revealing information about male nutritional health may also be significant for females: recent studies link paternal nutritional health at conception to offspring health (Veenendaal et al, 2013) and fertility (McPherson et al, 2014), effects that may be trans-generational (see also Lane et al, 2015).…”
Section: Diet-mediated Pheromones and Signaller Quality Via Direct Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have demonstrated mating preference for chemical signals produced by well-fed individuals compared with their starved counterparts (Fisher and Rosenthal, 2006;Giaquinto, 2010;Baruffaldi and Andrade, 2015). Additionally, under-nourished males may have low sperm counts, poor sperm quality (Dunn and Moss, 1992;Izquierdo et al, 2001;Guan et al, 2014), or lower resistance to disease (Moret and SchmidHempel, 2000). Pheromones revealing information about male nutritional health may also be significant for females: recent studies link paternal nutritional health at conception to offspring health (Veenendaal et al, 2013) and fertility (McPherson et al, 2014), effects that may be trans-generational (see also Lane et al, 2015).…”
Section: Diet-mediated Pheromones and Signaller Quality Via Direct Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data on the effects of nutritional treatments on body mass, scrotal circumference, semen quality and spermatozoal quality, Sertoli cell number and quality were published before [4, 5]. Our previous work showed significant differences between High diet and Low diet in terms of the above parameters, with the values for maintenance-fed rams being generally similar to those for the High diet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In addition, with change in testicular size, the efficiency of sperm production also changes [3]. We have been investigating the cellular and molecular processes of the testis response to nutrition, and we have found that under-nutrition despaired spermatogenesis in adult sheep [4, 5]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When his reports were published many years later (Mori 1959a,b), they showed that semen quality and sperm production were improved within a month or two by supplements of milk, pork and eggs! Subsequent studies included measures of testis mass, sperm output and 'spermatogenic efficiency', the number of sperm cells produced per unit mass of testis (Salamon 1964, Setchell et al 1965, Braden et al 1974, Oldham et al 1978, Cameron et al 1988, Guan et al 2014b. The changes in spermatogenic efficiency are particularly relevant to the present review -for example, (Oldham et al 1978) found that a 25% increase in testicular size led to an 81% increase in production of spermatozoa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these techniques only assess the semen quality and do not address the quality of the spermatozoa. To resolve these issues, we used computer-assisted semen analysis and a sperm chromatin structure assay (Guan et al 2014b). We found that sperm from rams that had been underfed for 65 days (testes regressing) swam with lower velocity and had more DNA damage than sperm from well-fed rams (testes growing).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%