2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00049-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Under-reporting of motor vehicle traffic crash victims in New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
88
1
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
9
88
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…in average crash speeds, personality traits or emotions), but a different reporting rate of single-vehicle crashes in comparison with multiple-vehicle crashes might provide an important alternative explanation. The existing literature showed consistently lower reporting rates for single vehicle crashes than for multiple vehicle crashes (Alsop & Langley, 2001;Amoros et al, 2006;Elvik & Mysen, 1999). Unfortunately, the magnitude of the underreporting is unclear and varies according to the involved road user type.…”
Section: Single Versus Multiple Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…in average crash speeds, personality traits or emotions), but a different reporting rate of single-vehicle crashes in comparison with multiple-vehicle crashes might provide an important alternative explanation. The existing literature showed consistently lower reporting rates for single vehicle crashes than for multiple vehicle crashes (Alsop & Langley, 2001;Amoros et al, 2006;Elvik & Mysen, 1999). Unfortunately, the magnitude of the underreporting is unclear and varies according to the involved road user type.…”
Section: Single Versus Multiple Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the quality and completeness of the DGT traffic crash database have yet to be assessed. We must therefore assume that these data are affected by the same problems as have been described previously for similar databases in other countries, i.e., under-representation of less severe accidents (9,23,24) and an undetermined degree of inaccuracy for driver-related variables (25)(26)(27). Inaccuracies in the ascription of infractions to each driver have been noted previously.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Difficulties with police injury assessments are also amply documented and the biases and understatement well evidenced (Jeffrey et al, 2009; Department for Transport UK, 2006;Alsop & Langley, 2001;Lopez et al, 2000). A particular issue is the definition of serious injury which varies widely (International Transport Forum, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%