Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
In spite of its complexities, foam underbalanced drilling has unique advantages such as reduced formation damage, improved rate of penetration, higher cutting-transport capacity, and lower circulation losses. Recent experimental studies in a wide range of experimental conditions show that foam flow in pipe can be represented by two different flow regimes: (i) the low-quality regime showing stable plug-flow pattern with fine-textured foams and (ii) the high-quality regime showing unstable slug-flow pattern with alternating free-gas with fine-textured foam segments. Such a new concept was successfully captured by a foam modeling technique with five model parameters, reproducing two distinct pressure contours.This study, for the first time, constructs foam drilling hydraulics model with two foam-flow regimes handling both stable and unstable flow characteristics, and investigates how the model improves current foam drilling hydraulics modeling based only on stable foam flow behavior. The results from three different scenarios (scenario 1: a vertical well, scenario 2: a deviated well with relatively short horizontal section, and scenario 3: a deviated well with relatively long horizontal section) with the transition foam quality between the two flow regimes (f g *) around 75-85% showed that significant differences in drilling hydraulics calculations might occur when the conventional technique was replaced by this new technique. For example, a drilling scenario tested with 10,000 ft deep vertical well (scenario 1) was shown to have as much as 32%, 48%, and 25% deviations in foam density, total velocity, and pressure gradient, respectively, at the bottomhole. Examples from two other deviated well trajectories (scenario 2 and scenario 3) exhibited similar responses, showing even more deviations. These results clearly demonstrate why incorporating two foam flow regimes into the current drilling hydraulics calculations is a crucial step toward evaluating and designing foam drilling practice accurately and reliably.Recent advances in drilling technologies have provided a unique opportunity to explore new horizons for oil and gas industry such as development of deepwater reservoirs, productions from tight formations, and advents of shale gas/oil resources, to name a few. These resulted in increasing drilling activities in the U.S., evidenced by rig count, in the past decade as shown in Fig. 1 -not only horizontal drilling has become popular reaching nearly 61 % in late 2012, but vertical and directional drilling also has become more challenging due to ever increasing well depth and water depth. This trend implies that more and * , m 1 , m 2 , K, and n), if the pressure contours in both high-quality and low-quality regimes can be approximated by a series of straight lines. Fig. 4 shows an example from Edrisi and Kam (2014) where how the model captures experimental data and how such two flow regimes can be reconstructed from the model are presented. Two parameters are employed to delineate the straight pressure contours in bo...
In spite of its complexities, foam underbalanced drilling has unique advantages such as reduced formation damage, improved rate of penetration, higher cutting-transport capacity, and lower circulation losses. Recent experimental studies in a wide range of experimental conditions show that foam flow in pipe can be represented by two different flow regimes: (i) the low-quality regime showing stable plug-flow pattern with fine-textured foams and (ii) the high-quality regime showing unstable slug-flow pattern with alternating free-gas with fine-textured foam segments. Such a new concept was successfully captured by a foam modeling technique with five model parameters, reproducing two distinct pressure contours.This study, for the first time, constructs foam drilling hydraulics model with two foam-flow regimes handling both stable and unstable flow characteristics, and investigates how the model improves current foam drilling hydraulics modeling based only on stable foam flow behavior. The results from three different scenarios (scenario 1: a vertical well, scenario 2: a deviated well with relatively short horizontal section, and scenario 3: a deviated well with relatively long horizontal section) with the transition foam quality between the two flow regimes (f g *) around 75-85% showed that significant differences in drilling hydraulics calculations might occur when the conventional technique was replaced by this new technique. For example, a drilling scenario tested with 10,000 ft deep vertical well (scenario 1) was shown to have as much as 32%, 48%, and 25% deviations in foam density, total velocity, and pressure gradient, respectively, at the bottomhole. Examples from two other deviated well trajectories (scenario 2 and scenario 3) exhibited similar responses, showing even more deviations. These results clearly demonstrate why incorporating two foam flow regimes into the current drilling hydraulics calculations is a crucial step toward evaluating and designing foam drilling practice accurately and reliably.Recent advances in drilling technologies have provided a unique opportunity to explore new horizons for oil and gas industry such as development of deepwater reservoirs, productions from tight formations, and advents of shale gas/oil resources, to name a few. These resulted in increasing drilling activities in the U.S., evidenced by rig count, in the past decade as shown in Fig. 1 -not only horizontal drilling has become popular reaching nearly 61 % in late 2012, but vertical and directional drilling also has become more challenging due to ever increasing well depth and water depth. This trend implies that more and * , m 1 , m 2 , K, and n), if the pressure contours in both high-quality and low-quality regimes can be approximated by a series of straight lines. Fig. 4 shows an example from Edrisi and Kam (2014) where how the model captures experimental data and how such two flow regimes can be reconstructed from the model are presented. Two parameters are employed to delineate the straight pressure contours in bo...
The placement of acid over the entire wellbore interval can be the key to successful stimulation treatments in wells with long (often horizontal) completion intervals. This paper discusses computer simulations performed to determine how fluids are distributed in the wellbore during bullheaded and circulated acidizing treatments. One of the novel aspects of these stimulations is the inclusion of wellbore effects arising from the transient flow of acid and diverter along the wellbore. The results give an insight into a possible cause of some of the poor stimulation performances observed in the field when typical volumes of low-viscosity acids were injected without diversion or selective-placement techniques. Such situations can result in the acid coming into contact with only a small fraction of the treatment interval. The simulations also show how viscosifying the acid could have improved the stimulation performance. This paper outlines the basic concepts of the simulations and some of the general trends observed from the results. In particular, the inclusion of transient wellbore flow calls for the modification of recently published guidelines for various diversion techniques. Introduction Horizontal wells are widely recognized to have advantages over vertical wells. They are popularly used, for example, to exploit thin oil-rim reservoirs, to avoid such drawdown-related problems as water/gas coning and sand production, and to extend wells by means of multiple drainholes. Yet their potential productivity improvement factors often fail to materialize in practice as a result of the skin (permeability-impairing near-wellbore damage) caused by drilling and completing the wells. Recent investigations have shown that skin can be as detrimental to the performance of horizontal wells as it is to that of vertical wells1–3. In fact, horizontal wells often experience higher skin values than conventional wells, as a result of the slotted liners or barefoot completions that are employed in such wells. Unlike the earlier industry standard of cased and cemented completions, these horizontal-well completions lack perforations. Field and laboratory experience has shown perforations to be an effective means of bypassing the impaired zone. For that reason the avoidance of near-wellbore permeability impairment, e.g., through the use of new drilling fluids and under-balanced drilling and completion, has been emphasized in the drilling of openhole horizontal wells4–6. A significant research effort over the last few years has also involved the experimental determination of the best clean-up procedures to follow prior to production7,8. This interest in wellbore cleaning has led to a resurgence of matrix acidizing, which over the years has proven to be a cost-effective method of removing impairment in the near-wellbore area of vertical wells. The stimulation of horizontal wells by means of matrix acidizing, however, has often met with limited success.
A review of foam and aerated drilling fluid technology is presented. The review includes an analysis of foam and aerated fluid rheology and flow-pressure loss models. Problems associated with the applications of current models are discussed. Suggestions for possible model modifications and needs for future research are offered. Recently, a new research initiative has been undertaken by the University of Tulsa to build an Advanced Cuttings Transport Facility (ACTF). Development and utilization of the ACTF will offer the industry an insight into the complex processes that govern fluid flow during drilling and production phases. The basic construction of the facility is in progress. The facility will eventually allow investigation of cuttings transport with incompressible and compressible drilling fluids at elevated temperature (200 °F) and elevated pressure (2000 psi). The design aspects of the ACTF and the scope of the project are discussed in the present paper.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.