Undereating and underrecording of habitual food intake in obese men: selective underreporting of fat intake

Goris, Annelies H. C.; Westerterp-Plantenga, Margriet S.; Westerterp, Klaas R.

doi:10.1093/ajcn/71.1.130

Cited by 435 publications

(329 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

296

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the literature, foods rich in sugar and/or fat as well as alcoholic beverages are often found to be underreported [56][57][58]. In the present study, the consumption of pastries, sweets, and ice cream is also to a considerable amount lower in underreporters than in plausible reporters in all three assessment methods.…”

Section: Comparison Of Underreportingsupporting

confidence: 44%

Comparison of food consumption and nutrient intake assessed with three dietary assessment methods: results of the German National Nutrition Survey II

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Comparison of food consumption, nutrient intake and underreporting of diet history interviews, 24-h recalls and weighed food records to gain further insight into specific strength and limitations of each method and to support the choice of the adequate dietary assessment method. Methods For 677 participants (14-80 years) of the German National Nutrition Survey II confidence intervals for food consumption and nutrient intake were calculated on basis of bootstrapping samples, Cohen's d for the relevance of differences, and intraclass correlation coefficients for the degree of agreement of dietary assessment methods. Low energy reporters were identified with Goldberg cut-offs. Results In 7 of 18 food groups diet history interviews showed higher consumption means than 24-h recalls and weighed food records. Especially mean values of food groups perceived as socially desirable, such as fruit and vegetables, were highest for diet history interviews. For "raw" and "cooked vegetables", the diet history interviews showed a mean consumption of 144 and 109 g/day in comparison with 68 and 70 g/day in 24-h recalls and 76 and 75 g/day in weighed food records, respectively. For "fruit", diet history interviews showed a mean consumption of 256 g/day in comparison with 164 g/day in 24-h recalls and 147 g/day in weighed food records. No major differences regarding underreporting of energy intake were found between dietary assessment methods. Conclusions With regard to estimating food consumption and nutrient intake, 24-h recalls and weighed food records showed smaller differences and better agreement than pairwise comparisons with diet history interviews.

show abstract

Section: Comparison Of Underreportingsupporting

confidence: 44%

Comparison of food consumption and nutrient intake assessed with three dietary assessment methods: results of the German National Nutrition Survey II

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To minimize misreporting, [16][17][18] we carefully trained subjects in completing weighed food records. In order to prevent bias introduced by the enthusiasm of the dietician providing the intervention, 8 careful attention was paid to standardizing the delivery method of the dietary programs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Randomized, multi-center trial of two hypo-energetic diets in obese subjects: high- versus low-fat content

Petersen¹,

Taylor

Saris

et al. 2005

Int J Obes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To investigate whether a hypo-energetic low-fat diet is superior to a hypo-energetic high-fat diet for the treatment of obesity. Design: Open-label, 10-week dietary intervention comparing two hypo-energetic (À600 kcal/day) diets with a fat energy percent of 20-25 or 40-45. Subjects: Obese (BMI X30 kg/m 2 ) adult subjects (n ¼ 771), from eight European centers. Measurements: Body weight loss, dropout rates, proportion of subjects who lost more than 10% of initial body weight, blood lipid profile, insulin and glucose. Results: The dietary fat energy percent was 25% in the low-fat group and 40% in the high-fat group (mean difference: 16 (95% confidence interval (CI) 15-17)%). Average weight loss was 6.9 kg in the low-fat group and 6.6 kg in the high-fat group (mean difference: 0.3 (95% CI À0.2 to 0.8) kg). Dropout was 13.6% (n ¼ 53) in the low-fat group and 18.3% (n ¼ 70) in the high-fat group (P ¼ 0.001). Among completers, more subjects lost 410% in the low-fat group than in the high-fat group ((20.8%, n ¼ 70) versus (14.7%, n ¼ 46), P ¼ 0.02). Fasting plasma total, low-density lipoprotein-and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol decreased in both groups, but more so in the low-fat group than in the high-fat group. Fasting plasma insulin and glucose were lowered equally by both diets. Conclusions: The low-fat diet produced similar mean weight loss as the high-fat diet, but resulted in more subjects losing 410% of initial body weight and fewer dropouts. Both diets produced favorable changes in fasting blood lipids, insulin and glucose.

show abstract

“…24 h EI is hard to measure reliably, especially in obese subjects (Roberts et al, 1998;Seidell, 1998). Under-reporting of food intake is a very common problem (Schoeller & Seidell, 1990;Johnson et al, 1994;Goris et al, 2000Goris et al, , 2001. In this study, we tried to skirt around these problems of misreporting by using a different design.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of grape-seed extract on 24 h energy intake in humans

2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Since grape-seed extract has been shown to stimulate lipolysis in vitro and reduce food intake in rats, we assessed the efficacy of grape-seed extract with respect to energy intake (EI) and satiety. Design: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study, 51 subjects (age 18-65 y, body mass index 22-30 kg/m 2 ) ate an ad libitum lunch and dinner twice in the University Restaurant for 3 days. Standard breakfasts and snacks were provided. Supplements were taken 30-60 min prior to each meal. Results: In the total study population, no difference in 24 h EI was found between the grape-seed extract and placebo. However, in the subgroup of subjects (n¼23) with an energy requirement Zthe median of 7.5 MJ/day, EI was reduced by 4% (DEI 352.1 kJ/24 h, P¼0.05) after grape-seed extract compared to placebo treatment. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in macronutrient composition, attitude towards eating, satiety, mood or tolerance. Conclusions: Grape seed reduced 24 h EI, with on average 4% in subjects who had an energy requirement Z7.5 MJ/day, without further effects on satiety, mood or tolerance. These findings suggest that grape seed could be effective in reducing 24 h EI in normal to overweight dietary unrestrained subjects, and could, therefore, play a significant role in body-weight management.

show abstract

Undereating and underrecording of habitual food intake in obese men: selective underreporting of fat intake

Abstract: Total underreporting by the obese men was explained by underrecording and undereating. The obese men selectively underreported fat intake.

Cited by 435 publications

References 25 publications

Comparison of food consumption and nutrient intake assessed with three dietary assessment methods: results of the German National Nutrition Survey II

Comparison of food consumption and nutrient intake assessed with three dietary assessment methods: results of the German National Nutrition Survey II

Randomized, multi-center trial of two hypo-energetic diets in obese subjects: high- versus low-fat content

The effect of grape-seed extract on 24 h energy intake in humans

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About