“…A total of 573 studies were retrieved. According to the aforementioned screening criteria and double assessment by two reviewers, we excluded 151 duplicate documents by reading topics and abstracts, removed 330 documents that did not meet the inclusion criteria, ruled out 46 non-conforming documents by reading the full text, and finally incorporated 46 articles, [15,[17][18][19][21][22][23][24]27,28,32,35,44,50,57], including 10 in English and five in Chinese. In addition, 14 papers did not describe the type of study and could not be judged [13,16,25,31,33,34,[37][38][39][40][41]43,48,58], and there was only one ambispective cohort study [49].…”